← All postsβš–οΈ Comparison hub

Every big ETF head to head: the scoreboard

Most ETF decisions come down to two funds. Here are the twelve matchups Australians ask about most, with current fees, returns and overlap, and what actually separates each pair.

Joshua Stega, financial adviser5 min readFirst published 6 May 2026 Β· Updated 10 November 2026
The short answer

Most matchups are decided by structure, not brand: which index, which fee, and whether the currency is hedged. Where two funds track nearly the same market, such as VAS and A200 (94% the same), the cheaper fund has edged ahead. Where they track different markets, such as VGS and IVV, the gap is far bigger and depends on which market led. All figures are to 30 September 2026.

The scoreboard

MatchupFees5-year returnWhat decides it
VAS vs A2000.07% / 0.04%+36.7% / +39.9%Fee. 94% overlap
VGS vs IVV0.18% / 0.04%+74.6% / +87.8%World vs US only
VGS vs BGBL0.18% / 0.08%3 years: +64.1% / +67.4%Fee. 76% overlap
IVV vs VTS0.04% / 0.03%+87.8% / +79.2%Big US vs all US
VDHG vs DHHF0.27% / 0.19%+45.0% / +55.4%Bonds sleeve and fee
VGS vs VGAD0.18% / 0.21%+74.6% / +67.4%Currency hedge
VHY vs SYI0.25% / 0.20%+62.4% / +57.1%Dividend screen
NDQ vs FANG0.48% / 0.35%+104.1% / +158.1%100 vs 10 companies
AAA vs BILL0.18% / 0.07%+17.0% / +16.8%Near tie
VAF vs IAF0.10% / 0.10%−0.7% / −0.9%Near tie
GOLD vs QAU0.40% / 0.59%+144.5% / +116.9%Currency hedge
VAS vs VGS0.07% / 0.18%+36.7% / +74.6%Australia vs world

Cumulative total returns including distributions to 30 September 2026. BGBL is not yet five years old. Source: TMX Australia monthly funds report.

Who won

Return gap in each matchup

β—€ First fund wonSecond fund won β–Ά
1 year5 years
VAS vs A200
+0.7 pts
+3.2 pts
VGS vs IVV
+0.0 pts
+13.2 pts
IVV vs VTS
βˆ’0.3 pts
βˆ’8.6 pts
VDHG vs DHHF
+0.6 pts
+10.4 pts
VGS vs VGAD
+7.0 pts
βˆ’7.2 pts
VHY vs SYI
+2.8 pts
βˆ’5.3 pts
AAA vs BILL
βˆ’0.1 pts
βˆ’0.2 pts
GOLD vs QAU
+4.6 pts
βˆ’27.6 pts
VAS vs VGS
+7.9 pts
+37.9 pts
Second fund minus first fund, percentage points of cumulative total return to 30 September 2026. NDQ vs FANG left out: FANG won by 54 points over five years.

Australian shares: VAS vs A200 vs IOZ

The three big Australian share funds overlap by 91% to 95%. A200 is cheapest at 0.04% and returned 6.9% a year over five years against 6.5% for VAS. VAS holds about 100 extra smaller companies. IOZ sits in between at 0.05%. Pick one and don't hold two. Full analysis: VAS vs A200 vs IOZ.

International shares: VGS vs IVV vs VTS vs BGBL

This is really two questions. First, US only or the whole developed world? IVV and VTS are US only; VGS and BGBL are global but still mostly US. US giants led, so IVV returned 13.4% a year over five years against 11.8% for VGS. Second, which fund within the choice? BGBL does a similar job to VGS for less than half the fee. Full analysis: IVV vs VGS vs VTS and VGS vs BGBL.

All-in-one: VDHG vs DHHF vs GHHF

VDHG keeps about 10% in bonds and cash; DHHF is all shares and cheaper. Over five years DHHF returned 9.2% a year against 7.7% for VDHG. GHHF borrows to lift exposure: it returned 12.0% last year, against 8.1% for DHHF, but it falls harder too. Full analysis: VDHG vs DHHF vs GHHF.

Fees

Fee in each matchup

First fundSecond fund
VAS vs A200
0.07%
0.04%
VGS vs IVV
0.18%
0.04%
VGS vs BGBL
0.18%
0.08%
VDHG vs DHHF
0.27%
0.19%
VHY vs SYI
0.25%
0.20%
NDQ vs FANG
0.48%
0.35%
AAA vs BILL
0.18%
0.07%
GOLD vs QAU
0.40%
0.59%
Management fees (MER) per year at 30 September 2026. Source: TMX Australia monthly funds report.

Hedged or unhedged: VGS vs VGAD

Same shares, different currency treatment. Hedged VGAD won by 7 points last year as the Australian dollar rose; unhedged VGS won by 7 points over five years. We cover this in two guides: when to use each and the best option in every category.

Income: VHY vs SYI

Both hold high-dividend Australian companies and pay franked income. VHY is far larger ($8.2 billion) and has the better five-year record, 62.4% against 57.1%. SYI is cheaper at 0.20% and won the past year, 14.8% against 12.0%. They overlap by about 50%, so they are genuinely different funds. More in our dividend ETF review.

Tech: NDQ vs FANG

NDQ holds the 100 biggest Nasdaq companies. FANG holds about 10 mega-cap tech names, equally weighted. Concentration paid off: FANG returned 158.1% over five years against 104.1%. FANG is cheaper too, but ten companies is a narrow bet. More in the best technology ETFs.

How similar are these pairs?

Overlap

How much of each pair is the same

VAS and A200
94%
VGS and BGBL
76%
VGS and IVV
65%
VDHG and DHHF
64%
VHY and SYI
50%
NDQ and FANG
45%
Overlap counts the smaller weight of every company held by both funds. Issuer holdings at 30 September to 30 October 2026.
The one rule: above about 75% overlap, two funds are doing the same job, so choose on fee and size and own one. Below about 50%, they are different bets, so choose on what you want to own.

Check any pair in the overlap calculator β†’

Cash, bonds and gold

  • AAA vs BILL. Both returned about 4% last year. BILL charges 0.07% against 0.18% for AAA, yet AAA's return has matched it. See the best cash ETFs.
  • VAF vs IAF. Same fee, same type of index, near-identical results. VAF and IAF are both down slightly over five years after the 2022 rate rises.
  • GOLD vs QAU. Unhedged GOLD beat hedged QAU by 27.6 points over five years. See gold ETF options.

The bigger questions

Build your own comparison β†’

Common questions

What is the difference between VAS and A200?

VAS holds about 300 Australian companies for 0.07% a year; A200 holds the top 200 for 0.04%. They are 94% the same. A200 has returned slightly more over five years, 39.9% against 36.7%.

Is VGS or IVV better?

They do different jobs. IVV is the S&P 500 only, for 0.04%. VGS covers about 20 developed countries for 0.18%. IVV has returned more over five years because US large companies led.

Is DHHF or VDHG better?

DHHF is cheaper (0.19% vs 0.27%) and all shares, and returned 55.4% over five years against 45.0%. VDHG keeps about 10% in bonds and cash, which gives a slightly smoother ride.

Is VHY or SYI the better dividend ETF?

VHY has the better five-year return (62.4% vs 57.1%) and is much bigger. SYI is cheaper and won the past year. They overlap by about half.

Joshua Stega

Joshua Stega is a financial adviser with 20 years' experience and the founder of ETF Adviser. He built ReviewETF to make every Australian ETF easy to find and compare.

General information only. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider the PDS and TMD before investing. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Data as at 30 September 2026.

Keep in touch with the markets

Get Joshua's weekly ETF research, trade alerts and the model portfolio. Free for 30 days.

Start your free trial

Keep reading