The Top 5 ETF Issuers on the ASX — Who They Are, What They're Best At, and What to Actually Buy

The Australian ETF market is worth about $329 billion across roughly 400 funds. But you'd never need to look at most of them. 77% of all assets sit with just five issuers — Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, and Global X. Everyone else combined accounts for less than a quarter of the market.
Each of these top 5 has carved out a distinct niche. Vanguard dominates core index exposure. BetaShares does the most ETFs of anyone (100 funds). iShares runs the cheapest foreign equity products. VanEck wins on factor tilts and thematic breadth. Global X owns the commodities space.
This blog breaks each one down: their biggest funds by AUM (where the money actually sits) and their best performers by 5-year total return (what actually worked). No fund manager wrote this. No issuer is paying for placement. Just data.
Market share at a glance

Rank | Issuer | AUM | Market Share | Funds | Avg MER |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Vanguard | $90.6B | 27.5% | 36 | 0.24% |
2 | BetaShares | $63.2B | 19.2% | 100 | 0.52% |
3 | iShares (BlackRock) | $54.5B | 16.5% | 56 | 0.27% |
4 | VanEck | $31.1B | 9.4% | 49 | 0.45% |
5 | Global X | $15.8B | 4.8% | 50 | 0.47% |
Top 5 total | $255.2B | 77.4% | 291 | — |
Vanguard holds more money than BetaShares and iShares combined despite running only a third as many funds. That's the power of owning the biggest two index ETFs on the ASX — VAS alone holds $23B.
Fee comparison — cost sets the floor for long-term returns

Issuer | Cheapest | Most Expensive | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard | 0.03% (VTS) | 0.47% | 0.24% |
iShares | 0.04% (IVV) | 0.69% | 0.27% |
VanEck | 0.17% | 0.97% | 0.45% |
Global X | 0.03% | 1.00% | 0.47% |
BetaShares | 0.04% (A200) | 1.48% | 0.52% |
Vanguard and iShares are structurally the cheapest issuers. Their business model relies on passive scale — low-fee flagship index funds with billions in AUM. BetaShares runs the widest spread because its lineup includes both ultra-cheap index ETFs (A200 at 0.04%) and complex active/leveraged funds charging 1%+.
If you build a portfolio mostly from Vanguard or iShares flagship index ETFs, you'll have an all-in fee well under 0.20% p.a. That's the benchmark to beat. Our fee ranking blog covers this in more detail.
Top 5 funds by AUM — each of the Big 5 issuers

This is where the money actually is. These 25 funds represent roughly $160B — about half the entire ASX ETF market.
🥇 Vanguard — $90.6B across 36 ETFs
Full list: Vanguard ETFs on ReviewETF
Vanguard is the default choice for index investors in Australia. Deep liquidity, rock-bottom fees, and the biggest equity ETFs on the ASX. If you own one Australian ETF, odds are it's Vanguard.
Top 5 by AUM:
Ticker | Fund | AUM | MER | 5Y Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Australian Shares | $23.3B | 0.07% | +43.2% | |
MSCI World ex-Australia | $14.3B | 0.18% | +74.7% | |
Australian High Yield | $7.0B | 0.25% | +64.6% | |
MSCI World (hedged) | $6.1B | 0.21% | +53.8% | |
US Total Market | $5.9B | 0.03% | +77.9% |
What's going on: The VAS + VGS combo is the most common "two-ETF portfolio" in Australia. Both sit at fees competitors can't match at Vanguard's scale. VTS at 0.03% is the cheapest ETF on the ASX — you cannot beat that on cost anywhere.
Top 5 by 5-year total return:
Ticker | Fund | 5Y Return | MER |
|---|---|---|---|
US Total Market | +77.9% | 0.03% | |
Global Value Equity (active) | +77.2% | 0.28% | |
MSCI World ex-Australia | +74.7% | 0.18% | |
Ethically Conscious Intl | +66.7% | 0.18% | |
Australian High Yield | +64.6% | 0.25% |
Key insight: Every one of Vanguard's top-performing funds has international exposure. The Australian-only options (VAS, VHY) lag significantly. Vanguard's US and global equity ETFs are among the most reliable compounding tools on the ASX.
Best for: Core long-term holdings. The default starting point for most Australian portfolios.
🥈 BetaShares — $63.2B across 100 ETFs
Full list: BetaShares ETFs on ReviewETF
BetaShares has more ETFs on the ASX than any other issuer — 100 funds covering everything from ultra-cheap index products to complex leveraged strategies. They innovate fastest but the average fee is the highest of the top 5.
Top 5 by AUM:
Ticker | Fund | AUM | MER | 5Y Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia 200 | $9.2B | 0.04% | +45.2% | |
Nasdaq 100 | $6.9B | 0.48% | +92.3% | |
Australian High Interest Cash | $5.1B | 0.18% | +15.0% | |
Global Shares | $3.6B | 0.08% | <5yr | |
Global Sustainability Leaders | $3.4B | 0.59% | +50.3% |
What's going on: A200 is the direct price competitor to Vanguard's VAS — same 0.04% fee, same exposure. NDQ is the most-owned Nasdaq 100 ETF on the ASX. AAA is the cash parking ETF everyone uses as their emergency fund proxy.
Top 5 by 5-year total return:
Ticker | Fund | 5Y Return | MER |
|---|---|---|---|
Global Gold Miners (hedged) | +171.3% | 0.57% | |
Gold Bullion (hedged) | +135.4% | 0.59% | |
Global Energy (hedged) | +132.5% | 0.57% | |
Crude Oil (hedged) | +126.6% | 1.29% | |
Japan (hedged) | +93.8% | 0.56% |
Key insight: BetaShares' top performers are all commodity and sector plays, not their core index funds. The cheap workhorses (A200, BGBL) are good; the commodity/geared products are where the outsized returns came from.
Best for: Tactical exposure to sectors, commodities, or themes your core ETFs miss. The 100-fund range means there's usually a BetaShares product for whatever you want.
🥉 iShares (BlackRock) — $54.5B across 56 ETFs
iShares is the cheapest issuer after Vanguard and dominates US and global equity exposure. Their flagship ETFs are the go-to alternatives to Vanguard for many investors.
Top 5 by AUM:
Ticker | Fund | AUM | MER | 5Y Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
S&P 500 | $11.7B | 0.04% | +87.4% | |
ASX 200 | $8.3B | 0.05% | +44.9% | |
Global 100 | $4.9B | 0.40% | +106.8% | |
Core Composite Bond | $3.6B | 0.10% | −0.1% | |
S&P 500 (hedged) | $3.3B | 0.10% | +47.6% |
What's going on: IVV is the most popular S&P 500 ETF on the ASX — cheaper than Vanguard's hedged alternatives and more liquid than most. IOZ competes directly with A200 and VAS on cost.
Top 5 by 5-year total return:
Ticker | Fund | 5Y Return | MER |
|---|---|---|---|
Global 100 | +106.8% | 0.40% | |
S&P 500 | +87.4% | 0.04% | |
MSCI World ex-Australia ESG | +70.0% | 0.09% | |
Global 100 (hedged) | +69.9% | 0.43% | |
Europe | +61.1% | 0.58% |
Key insight: IOO is quietly one of the best-performing ETFs in Australia — owning 100 global mega-caps has crushed broader indices. IWLD at 0.09% MER delivered +70% — a genuinely cheap global equity ETF.
Best for: US and global equity core exposure. IVV + IOZ is a competitive alternative to VGS + VAS if you prefer BlackRock's products.
4. VanEck — $31.1B across 49 ETFs
VanEck is known for factor tilts (quality, equal-weight, moat) and sector specialists. Their flagship QUAL has become a staple of many portfolios — a quality-factor alternative to the plain-vanilla MSCI World.
Top 5 by AUM:
Ticker | Fund | AUM | MER | 5Y Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
International Quality | $7.6B | 0.40% | +79.1% | |
Australian Subordinated Debt | $3.6B | 0.29% | +21.1% | |
Australian Equal Weight | $3.1B | 0.35% | +39.3% | |
International Quality (hedged) | $2.2B | 0.43% | +54.1% | |
Global Infrastructure (hedged) | $1.9B | 0.20% | +40.9% |
What's going on: QUAL has grown to $7.6B by offering a factor tilt (quality) that complements broader MSCI World exposure. MVW spreads risk across the ASX 200 rather than concentrating in the big 4 banks + BHP.
Top 5 by 5-year total return:
Ticker | Fund | 5Y Return | MER |
|---|---|---|---|
Gold Miners | +221.9% | 0.53% | |
Australian Resources | +80.7% | 0.35% | |
International Quality | +79.1% | 0.40% | |
Australian Banks | +78.2% | 0.28% | |
International Value | +75.7% | 0.40% |
Key insight: GDX at +222% over 5 years is one of the best-performing ETFs in Australia, full stop. Gold miners are the leveraged gold-price play. MVR (resources) and MVB (banks) both delivered +78%+ by betting on sector concentration that other "diversified" ETFs avoid.
Best for: Factor tilts (QUAL, MVW, VLUE) if you want to move beyond plain-vanilla indexing. GDX for leveraged gold exposure.
5. Global X — $15.8B across 50 ETFs
Full list: Global X ETFs on ReviewETF
Global X owns the commodities and specialty thematic space on the ASX. Their physical gold and silver ETFs have been among the best-performing products over 5 years, period.
Top 5 by AUM:
Ticker | Fund | AUM | MER | 5Y Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Gold | $6.2B | 0.40% | +195.3% | |
Physical Silver | $1.6B | 0.49% | +227.5% | |
FANG+ | $1.2B | 0.35% | +109.9% | |
Battery Tech & Lithium | $689M | 0.69% | +80.7% | |
Copper Miners | $657M | 0.65% | <5yr |
What's going on: GOLD at $6.2B is the biggest physical gold ETF on the ASX — an enormous piece of Global X's business is simply gold investors. FANG+ is the concentrated mega-cap US tech play (10 stocks, +110% over 5 years at 0.35% MER — cheaper than most tech ETFs).
Top 5 by 5-year total return:
Ticker | Fund | 5Y Return | MER |
|---|---|---|---|
Physical Silver | +227.5% | 0.49% | |
Physical Gold | +195.3% | 0.40% | |
Precious Metal Basket | +115.8% | 0.44% | |
FANG+ | +109.9% | 0.35% | |
Battery Tech & Lithium | +80.7% | 0.69% |
Key insight: Global X's best performers are commodity plays. ETPMAG (silver) and GOLD (gold) both more than tripled over 5 years. FANG+ is the standout equity product — cheaper and more concentrated than broader tech ETFs.
Best for: Commodity exposure (physical gold, silver, precious metals), concentrated thematic bets, and FANG+ as a differentiated tech allocation.
Top 5 funds by 5-year total return — each issuer

Looking at the best long-term performers across all 5 issuers, a clear pattern emerges:
Rank | Fund | Issuer | 5Y Return | MER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Global X | +227.5% | 0.49% | |
2 | VanEck | +221.9% | 0.53% | |
3 | Global X | +195.3% | 0.40% | |
4 | BetaShares | +171.3% | 0.57% | |
5 | BetaShares | +135.4% | 0.59% | |
6 | BetaShares | +132.5% | 0.57% | |
7 | BetaShares | +126.6% | 1.29% | |
8 | Global X | +115.8% | 0.44% | |
9 | Global X | +109.9% | 0.35% | |
10 | iShares | +106.8% | 0.40% |
The pattern: Commodities dominated. Gold, silver, precious metals miners, oil, and energy stocks filled 7 of the top 10 spots. The remaining three were concentrated equity plays (IOO's 100 global mega-caps, FANG+, and Vanguard's US Total Market VTS).
Diversified index ETFs don't make the top 10 — not because they're bad, but because concentrated sector bets always win in any single 5-year window. The best-performing sector/theme changes constantly. VAS, VGS, IOZ, and IVV remain the right core holdings for most investors despite not making this list.
Which issuer for which job?
Goal | Best Issuer | Why |
|---|---|---|
Cheapest core index ETFs | Vanguard (tied with iShares) | 0.03% on VTS, 0.07% on VAS |
Biggest global equity fund | Vanguard (VGS) | $14.3B AUM, tight spreads |
Cheapest US S&P 500 | iShares (IVV) | 0.04% MER, $11.7B AUM |
Factor tilts (quality, value, equal weight) | VanEck | QUAL, MVW, VLUE all well-established |
Thematic and sector ETFs | BetaShares | 100 funds, most coverage of any issuer |
Physical gold / commodities | Global X | GOLD, ETPMAG, ETPMPT all leaders |
Cash management | BetaShares (AAA) | $5B AUM, 0.18% MER |
Gold / resource miners | VanEck (GDX) | +222% over 5 years, $1.5B AUM |
Leveraged & inverse | BetaShares / Global X | GEAR, LNAS, SNAS |
Currency hedged | Any \u2014 BetaShares has the widest range | 30+ hedged ETFs alone |
Bottom line
If you're building a simple core portfolio: Vanguard and iShares provide almost everything you need at the lowest cost. VAS + VGS or IOZ + IVV + bonds is a complete solution for most investors.
If you're layering in satellites: VanEck for factor tilts, Global X for commodities, BetaShares for thematic or sector plays. These are where you pay higher fees in exchange for differentiated exposure you can't get from the core index funds.
What NOT to do: Don't spread your portfolio across every issuer just because they exist. Owning 15 ETFs from 5 different issuers usually means you've duplicated the same underlying stocks three times. Our portfolio overlap analysis shows how quickly this gets messy.
The top 5 issuers run essentially the whole ASX ETF market. Pick one or two as your core issuer, supplement with a specialist where you need it, and ignore the rest.
Related reading
Every ASX ETF ranked by fees — cheapest to most expensive across all issuers
How many ETFs should you actually hold? — the data on portfolio overlap
VGS vs BGBL — Vanguard vs BetaShares head to head
VAS vs A200 vs IOZ — the ASX core ETF comparison
IVV vs VGS vs VTS — iShares vs Vanguard international face-off
Is the cheapest ETF always the best? — why low fees matter but aren't the only thing
Data current to 31 March 2026. Source: CBOE Australia monthly report. Total return calculations assume reinvested distributions where applicable. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This article is general information only and does not consider your personal situation. Seek professional advice before investing.

