Global X Physical Precious Metal Basket Structured A (ETPMPM) Review & Analysis

MER Β· Top 50%AUM Β· #262 of 5081Y Return Β· Top 50%3Y Return Β· Top 25%5Y Return Β· Top 10%
What's new this monthData to 30 September 2026
  • βˆ’4.8% in September (total return), behind the median commodities ETF at βˆ’3.4%.
  • The unit price closed the month at $373.81, 37% below its 12-month high (range $312.20 to $595.00).

About ETPMPM

ETPMPM is a commodities ETF from Global X, listed on the ASX since January 2009. With $131m under management it is number 10 of 13 commodities ETFs by size. The management fee is 0.44% a year, about $44 on every $10,000 invested, in line with the typical commodities ETF at 0.44%.

Over five years it has returned +14.8% a year including distributions, against +16.4% for the median commodities ETF. With its focus on gold & precious metals, commodities & resources, it is the kind of fund many investors use as a smaller satellite holding alongside a diversified core.

Compare ETPMPM with

ETPMPM price by TradingView

Stock CodeETPMPM
Fund ManagerGlobal X
Asset ClassCommodities
AUM$131m
MER (%)0.44%
Net flows (Sep)$0.0m
Last Price$373.81
52-Week Range$312.20 – $595.00
Bid/Ask Spread–
Listing Date30/01/2009
ExchangeASX
IndexNot yet in our data. See the PDS
Issuer websiteGlobal X β†—

Performance (% return)

-5%30%65%100%1M-4.8%1Y4.7%3Y88.1%5Y99.7%
1 monthβˆ’4.8%
1 year+4.7%
3 years p.a.+23.4%
5 years p.a.+14.8%

$10,000 invested…

1 year ago$10,4673 years ago$18,8105 years ago$19,973

Value at 30 September 2026 with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage.

Total returns including distributions, to 30 September 2026. 1M, 1Y, 3Y and 5Y bars are cumulative.

ETPMPM at a glance: strengths and things to watch

πŸ‘ Strengths

  • Long track record. Listed since 2009, through several market cycles.

⚠️ Things to watch

  • Behind its peers. +14.8% a year over 5 years, against +16.4% for the median commodities ETF.

Worked out from ETPMPM's fees, size, flows, returns and trend against the 13 commodities ETFs in Australia, to 30 September 2026. General information, not a recommendation.

Joshua StegaetfadviserTrend check
Not rated yet

Is ETPMPM in a base or a trend?

ETPMPM doesn't have enough price history yet (about 11 months) for a reliable trend reading, or it is a cash-like fund whose price barely moves.

Why it matters: Every ETF moves between bases and trends. Knowing which stage it is in helps decide when to buy a satellite, and when to wait.

At ETF Adviser the core of a portfolio stays invested through every stage, and satellite ETFs are only bought in an uptrend. Members get a weekly update on which ETFs are breaking out of a base and which trends have broken.

Why no chart? This ETF does not have a reliable 12-month price history yet.

Read more at etfadviser.com.au β†’

Investment Focus

Themes & Sectors

Gold & precious metalsCommodities & resources

Portfolio Breakdown

Sector breakdown

  • Commodities100.0%

Holdings from the issuer's published portfolio. Compare ETPMPM's holdings with other ETFs β†’

Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.

Similar ETFs

CodeNameSame holdingsMERAUM1Y3Y p.a.5Y p.a.
ETPMAGGlobal X Physical Silver Structured A–0.49%$1.4bn+22.0%+34.3%+23.4%
ETPMPTGlobal X Physical Platinum Structured A–0.49%$79mβˆ’0.7%+19.3%+12.3%
GOLDGlobal X Physical Gold–0.40%$5.8bn+1.7%+27.0%+19.6%
GLDNiShares Physical Gold ETF–0.18%$458m+1.8%––
ETPMPDGlobal X Physical Palladium–0.49%$17mβˆ’10.1%βˆ’4.3%βˆ’8.1%
PMGOLDPerth Mint Gold–0.15%$2.4bn+1.9%+27.3%+19.9%

Same holdings is the share of ETPMPM's money in companies the other ETF also holds, weighted by size. No other ETF shares much with ETPMPM, so these are ETFs in the same category. See every ETF like ETPMPM β†’

ETPMPM vs its closest alternatives

What actually differs between ETPMPM and the ETFs most like it. Data to 30 Sep 2026.

ETPMAG Global X Physical Silver Structured A

  • ETPMPM is cheaper (0.44% vs 0.49%), worth about $3,329 on $100,000 over 20 years.
  • Over 3 years, a year: ETPMPM +23.4%, ETPMAG +34.3% (ETPMAG ahead by 10.9 percentage points).
  • ETPMAG is much larger ($1.4bn vs $131m), which usually means tighter trading spreads.

Full ETPMPM vs ETPMAG comparison β†’

ETPMPT Global X Physical Platinum Structured A

  • ETPMPM is cheaper (0.44% vs 0.49%), worth about $3,329 on $100,000 over 20 years.
  • Over 3 years, a year: ETPMPM +23.4%, ETPMPT +19.3% (ETPMPM ahead by 4.2 percentage points).

Compare ETPMPM and ETPMPT side by side β†’

GOLD Global X Physical Gold

  • GOLD is cheaper (0.40% vs 0.44%), worth about $2,685 on $100,000 over 20 years.
  • Over 3 years, a year: ETPMPM +23.4%, GOLD +27.0% (GOLD ahead by 3.6 percentage points).
  • GOLD is much larger ($5.8bn vs $131m), which usually means tighter trading spreads.

Compare ETPMPM and GOLD side by side β†’

General information only. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Popular comparisons

ETPMAG vs ETPMPM

Related Reads

ETPMPM FAQs

What is the fee for ETPMPM?

ETPMPM charges a management fee (MER) of 0.44% a year, according to the TMX Australia monthly funds report as at 30 September 2026.

How big is ETPMPM?

ETPMPM had $131m in funds under management as at 30 September 2026.

How has ETPMPM performed?

ETPMPM returned +4.7% over the year to 30 September 2026 (total return, including distributions). Over three years it returned +23.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Who manages ETPMPM?

ETPMPM is managed by Global X and has been listed since January 2009.

Disclaimer

This review is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider the Global X product disclosure statement (PDS) and target market determination (TMD) before investing. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.