Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
Global X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF (ZYUS) — Review & Analysis
ZYUS tracks the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility Index — selecting US stocks that combine high dividend yield with below-average volatility. AUM is $71.11 million as at May 2026 with a 0.35% p.a. management fee. Distributions are paid quarterly. Compare ZYUS across the dividend cohort on our high dividend yield ETF page or use the Compare ETFs tool to evaluate against VIHY, WDIV and INCM.
The income methodology applies two screens simultaneously — high yield plus low volatility. The S&P 500 universe is first filtered for dividend yield, then the highest-yielding 75 names are ranked by 12-month volatility and the lowest-volatility 50 are selected. The result is a defensive portfolio of mature US dividend payers — utilities, consumer staples, REITs, telecoms, regulated industrials — explicitly excluding the higher-volatility tech and consumer discretionary names that dominate the S&P 500.
ZYUS competes most directly with VIHY (Vanguard International Shares High Yield, 0.30%) and the broader global dividend funds WDIV and INCM. ZYUS is more US-concentrated than the broader global aristocrat funds, and the dual-screen methodology delivers cleaner low-vol-yield exposure than pure yield-tilted alternatives.
ZYUS is unhedged. The low-volatility tilt reduces drawdowns versus broader US dividend exposure during equity sell-offs but caps upside during strong rallies. Our high dividend yield ETFs 2026 passive income guide compares ZYUS alongside other US-focused income strategies.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| ALTRIA GROUP INC | 3.53% |
| HEALTHPEAK PROPE | 3.30% |
| VERIZON COMMUNIC | 3.27% |
| PFIZER INC | 2.94% |
| FRANKLIN RES INC | 2.81% |
| KRAFT HEINZ CO/T | 2.81% |
| ONEOK INC | 2.76% |
| VICI PROPERTIES | 2.61% |
| CROWN CASTLE INC | 2.45% |
| KIMCO REALTY | 2.44% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Real Estate | 22.7% |
| Consumer Staples | 16.16% |
| Utilities | 14.35% |
| Health Care | 12.92% |
| Financials | 12.6% |
| Energy | 9.29% |
| Communication Services | 6.72% |
| Industrials | 2.91% |
| Materials | 1.98% |
Related Reads

The Ultimate List of Dividend-Paying ETFs on the ASX (Ranked by 5 Year Data)
Most dividend ETF rankings are wrong. They sort by yield — biggest income at the top, smallest at the bottom — and call it a day. That approach has quietly torched investor capital for years.

Australia's Dividend ETFs Exposed 2026: VHY vs SYI vs IHD vs Every Other Income Fund
There are now 10 ETFs on the ASX competing for your dividend dollar. They all promise the same thing — high income from Australian shares. But over the past year, the gap between the best and worst is more than 30 percentage points. Some funds charge 4.5x more than others. And the headline yield issuers love to advertise can be deeply misleading.

High Dividend Yield & Income ETFs on the ASX: The 2026 Guide to Generating Passive Income
There are now 31 high-dividend and income ETFs on the ASX as at May 2026 — total assets around $18.6 billion, average MER 0.43%. They range from boring cash funds yielding ~4% to covered-call ETFs paying 9%+ headline yields that quietly erode your capital.
Similar ETFs
| Stock | Name | 1 Year % |
|---|---|---|
| BEST | ETFS US Quality ETF | +15.75% |
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026

