Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) — Review & Analysis
WDIV tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index — companies that have raised or maintained dividends every year for 10+ consecutive years. AUM is $348.94 million as at May 2026 with a 0.35% p.a. management fee. Distributions are paid quarterly. Compare WDIV across the dividend cohort on our high dividend yield ETF page or use the Compare ETFs tool to evaluate against VIHY or INCM.
The income methodology is fundamentally different from yield-chasing funds. Where most dividend ETFs select stocks by yield, WDIV requires a 10-year track record of dividend stability or growth before inclusion. The result is a defensive portfolio of mature, cash-generative global companies — utilities, consumer staples, REITs and global pharma — rather than the highest-yielding (and often riskiest) names. Annual yield is typically lower than yield-maximisers like VIHY, but the consistency premium has historically been worth the trade-off.
WDIV competes most directly with VIHY (Vanguard International Shares High Yield, 0.30%, $34.70M) and INCM (Betashares S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats, 0.45%, $94.13M). INCM uses a similar aristocrat methodology but Betashares' construction skews more US-heavy than WDIV's. For investors building a defensive global dividend sleeve with track-record-based screening, WDIV is one of the largest options.
WDIV is unhedged. The dividend aristocrat methodology has historically delivered lower drawdowns than yield-only funds during market stress. Our ultimate list of dividend-paying ETFs guide ranks WDIV alongside every dividend option on 5-year data.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| Apa Group | 1.93% |
| Bouygues | 1.91% |
| Sino Land | 1.85% |
| Henderson Land Dev | 1.77% |
| Edp | 1.70% |
| Enel | 1.68% |
| Far East Horizon (Red Chip) | 1.61% |
| Lg Uplus | 1.56% |
| Cvs Health Corporation | 1.55% |
| Altria Group | 1.53% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Financials | 26.4% |
| Utilities | 19.18% |
| Real Estate | 13.9% |
| Communication Services | 9.28% |
| Industrials | 9.15% |
| Health Care | 5.77% |
| Materials | 4.62% |
| Consumer Staples | 3.76% |
| Energy | 3.58% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.42% |
| Information Technology | 0.93% |
Related Reads

The Ultimate List of Dividend-Paying ETFs on the ASX (Ranked by 5 Year Data)
Most dividend ETF rankings are wrong. They sort by yield — biggest income at the top, smallest at the bottom — and call it a day. That approach has quietly torched investor capital for years.

Australia's Dividend ETFs Exposed 2026: VHY vs SYI vs IHD vs Every Other Income Fund
There are now 10 ETFs on the ASX competing for your dividend dollar. They all promise the same thing — high income from Australian shares. But over the past year, the gap between the best and worst is more than 30 percentage points. Some funds charge 4.5x more than others. And the headline yield issuers love to advertise can be deeply misleading.

High Dividend Yield & Income ETFs on the ASX: The 2026 Guide to Generating Passive Income
There are now 31 high-dividend and income ETFs on the ASX as at May 2026 — total assets around $18.6 billion, average MER 0.43%. They range from boring cash funds yielding ~4% to covered-call ETFs paying 9%+ headline yields that quietly erode your capital.
Similar ETFs
| Stock | Name | 1 Year % |
|---|---|---|
| CFLO | Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | +4.50% |
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026

