Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
Betashares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF (INCM) — Review & Analysis
INCM tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats — global companies with 10+ consecutive years of stable or growing dividends. AUM is $94.13 million as at May 2026 with a 0.45% p.a. management fee. Distributions are paid quarterly. Compare INCM across the dividend cohort on our high dividend yield ETF page or use the Compare ETFs tool to put INCM vs WDIV or VIHY side-by-side.
The income methodology mirrors WDIV — selecting global dividend aristocrats rather than chasing pure yield. INCM and WDIV both track the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index but BetaShares' specific tracking implementation produces slightly different country and sector weightings than State Street's WDIV product. The shared philosophy is the same — own companies with proven dividend reliability rather than maximising current yield, accepting lower headline distributions for higher consistency.
INCM's 0.45% fee is 10bp above WDIV (0.35%) — that's the cost differential between the two ETFs targeting the same index family. AUM scale favours WDIV at $348.94M vs INCM at $94.13M. For investors who specifically want the BetaShares brand and platform integration in their global dividend allocation, INCM is the natural choice; for cost-conscious investors, WDIV is meaningfully cheaper at similar exposure.
INCM is unhedged. The dividend aristocrat methodology emphasises consistency over yield — historical distribution growth has typically been 5-8% annually with low volatility, suitable for retirees building income that grows with inflation. Our ultimate list of dividend-paying ETFs guide ranks INCM and WDIV alongside every dividend option.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| APPLE INC | 6.20% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.30% |
| BROADCOM INC | 5.00% |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 4.30% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 3.70% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 2.60% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP | 2.60% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE | 2.10% |
| CHEVRON CORP | 1.90% |
| QUALCOMM INC | 1.90% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Information Technology | 27% |
| Financials | 18.3% |
| Health Care | 15.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.5% |
| Industrials | 7.9% |
| Energy | 6.2% |
| Communication Services | 5.4% |
| Utilities | 4.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 2.4% |
| Other | 3% |
Related Reads

The Ultimate List of Dividend-Paying ETFs on the ASX (Ranked by 5 Year Data)
Most dividend ETF rankings are wrong. They sort by yield — biggest income at the top, smallest at the bottom — and call it a day. That approach has quietly torched investor capital for years.

Australia's Dividend ETFs Exposed 2026: VHY vs SYI vs IHD vs Every Other Income Fund
There are now 10 ETFs on the ASX competing for your dividend dollar. They all promise the same thing — high income from Australian shares. But over the past year, the gap between the best and worst is more than 30 percentage points. Some funds charge 4.5x more than others. And the headline yield issuers love to advertise can be deeply misleading.

High Dividend Yield & Income ETFs on the ASX: The 2026 Guide to Generating Passive Income
There are now 31 high-dividend and income ETFs on the ASX as at May 2026 — total assets around $18.6 billion, average MER 0.43%. They range from boring cash funds yielding ~4% to covered-call ETFs paying 9%+ headline yields that quietly erode your capital.
Similar ETFs
| Stock | Name | 1 Year % |
|---|---|---|
| CFLO | Global Cash Flow Kings ETF | +4.50% |
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026

