Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
State Street® SPDR® S&P®/ASX 200 ETF (STW) — Review & Analysis
STW is the original ETF on the ASX — State Street launched it in August 2001, making it the oldest Australian-listed ETF by more than 7 years. As at May 2026, STW holds $6.5 billion in assets — about 1.8% of the entire $358 billion Australian ETF market. Despite being the original, STW has lost market share to newer competitors: VAS ($25.5B), A200 ($9.8B) and IOZ ($8.6B) are all larger as at May 2026. STW tracks the official S&P/ASX 200 Index — the same benchmark you see on the evening news every day. The management fee is 0.05% per annum — competitive but not the cheapest in the category.
To compare STW side-by-side with every other ETF on the ASX, see the full ETF directory.
STW holds the 200 largest companies on the ASX, weighted by market capitalisation. As at May 2026, the top 10 holdings make up roughly 45% of the fund — Commonwealth Bank (~10.5%), BHP (~9.5%), Westpac, NAB, ANZ, Wesfarmers, Macquarie, CSL, Woodside and Rio Tinto. Sector weights mirror the broader ASX 200: ~33% financials, ~22% materials, ~7% healthcare, ~7% consumer discretionary. STW, IOZ, A200 and VAS all track essentially the same benchmark and produce nearly identical returns — the differences come down to fees, methodology nuances and brand familiarity. Over the 5 years to May 2026, STW returned +40.3% total return — comparable to IOZ (+40.8%) and A200 (+41.8%).
STW pays distributions quarterly (late March, June, September and December) with significant franking credits. As at May 2026, the trailing 12-month cash distribution yield runs around 4.0-4.5%, distributions are typically about 80% franked, and the grossed-up yield comes in near 5.5% for an Australian resident taxpayer — virtually identical to its peer ETFs. STW is still held in many older SMSFs and self-directed portfolios — partly out of inertia, partly because of State Street's longstanding institutional relationships. New investors typically pick A200 (0.04% fee) or VAS (largest, most liquid) over STW today.
STW is a perfectly fine ASX 200 tracker — just one that's been outflanked on fees by newer entrants. Unless you're already a State Street client or prefer the SPDR brand, A200 (cheaper at 0.04%) and VAS (largest, broader 300-stock index) are both arguably better picks today. A $10,000 investment in STW at its August 2001 launch (with all distributions reinvested) would be worth roughly $63,000 as at May 2026 — an annualised return of about 7.9% per year over the 25-year period. That's the power of compounding broad Australian equity exposure over a quarter of a century. For the comparison, see VAS vs A200 vs IOZ — which Australian shares ETF is best.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| Cmnwlth Bk Of Aust | 9.68% |
| Bhp Group Ltd | 9.15% |
| Westpac Bkg Corp | 4.91% |
| Natl Australia Bk | 4.75% |
| Anz Group Hldgs Li | 3.99% |
| Wesfarmers Ltd | 3.47% |
| Csl Ltd | 3.20% |
| Macquarie Gp Ltd | 2.76% |
| Goodman Group | 2.33% |
| Telstra Group Ltd | 2.07% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Financials | 32.74% |
| Materials | 24% |
| Industrials | 7.44% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.43% |
| Health Care | 7.17% |
| Real Estate | 6.61% |
| Communication Services | 3.7% |
| Energy | 3.65% |
| Consumer Staples | 3.41% |
| Information Technology | 2.48% |
| Utilities | 1.37% |
Related Reads

Every ETF Head-to-Head Comparison: VAS vs A200, VGS vs IVV, DHHF vs VDHG and More
VAS vs A200, VGS vs IVV, DHHF vs VDHG, hedged vs unhedged & more. Every Australian ETF head-to-head comparison ranked, scored and explained

Best Low-Cost Index Funds Australia 2026 Guide
No fund manager wrote this article. No issuer is paying for placement. Every number comes from CBOE Australia data as at March 2026. We sort, score and call it like it is.
Similar ETFs
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026

