Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
BetaShares Australian Quality ETF (AQLT) — Review & Analysis
AQLT is a factor-tilted alternative to broad-market Australian equity ETFs, with $1.2 billion in assets as at May 2026 — about 0.3% of the entire $358 billion Australian ETF market. Betashares launched AQLT in April 2022 as the Australian counterpart to their successful QLTY global quality ETF. The fund tracks the Solactive Australia Quality Select Index, holding approximately 40 ASX-listed companies screened for three quality metrics: high return on equity, low debt-to-equity, and stable year-over-year earnings growth. The management fee is 0.35% per annum — higher than passive VAS (0.07%) or A200 (0.04%), but reasonable for factor-tilted exposure.
To compare AQLT side-by-side with every other ETF on the ASX, see the full ETF directory.
AQLT's quality screens systematically underweight banks and miners (which typically score lower on stable earnings) and overweight healthcare, technology, consumer staples and industrials. As at May 2026, the top 10 holdings typically include CSL, Macquarie, Goodman Group, James Hardie, REA Group, Cochlear, Wesfarmers, Sonic Healthcare, Carsales and ResMed — a very different mix from broad-market VAS (which is dominated by CBA, BHP and the big-4 banks). The strategy effectively gives Australian investors the structural sector exposures they miss in VAS. Over the 3 years to May 2026, AQLT returned +52.9% total return — well ahead of VAS (+34.6%) and A200 (+35.2%) over the same window.
AQLT pays distributions quarterly (late September, December, March and June) with significant franking credits. As at May 2026, the trailing 12-month cash distribution yield runs around 2.5-3.0%, distributions are typically about 80% franked, lifting the grossed-up yield to around 3.5-4.0% for an Australian resident taxpayer. The cash yield is lower than VAS (~4%) because AQLT systematically underweights bank dividends — the trade-off is higher capital growth from the quality tilt. AQLT will lag VAS in periods when banks and miners rally (like the 12 months to May 2026); it will outperform when those sectors lag.
AQLT is a defensible alternative to broad-market Australian equity ETFs if you specifically want quality-factor exposure without the banks-and-miners concentration of VAS. At 0.35% MER it's 5x the cost of VAS, so the quality factor needs to deliver excess returns to justify the fee. So far, it has — AQLT has outperformed VAS by ~18 percentage points over 3 years. A $10,000 investment in AQLT at its April 2022 launch (with all distributions reinvested) would be worth roughly $16,000 as at May 2026 — an annualised return of about 12.5% per year over the 4-year period.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| BHP GROUP LTD | 8.80% |
| TELSTRA GROUP LTD | 6.00% |
| WESFARMERS LTD | 5.90% |
| ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LTD | 5.20% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 4.70% |
| NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD | 4.60% |
| WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD | 4.30% |
| WESTPAC BANKING CORP | 4.00% |
| MACQUARIE GROUP LTD | 3.80% |
| MONADELPHOUS GROUP LTD | 3.50% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Financials | 37% |
| Materials | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.4% |
| Health Care | 9.6% |
| Industrials | 8.5% |
| Information Technology | 7.1% |
| Communication Services | 7% |
| Energy | 3.3% |
Related Reads

Best Performing ETFs in Australia: Which Funds Actually Beat Their Benchmark?
Every ETF listed on the ASX has a benchmark it is measured against. For index ETFs, the goal is to match that benchmark as closely as possible after deducting fees. For active ETFs, the goal is to beat it — and charge you more for the privilege. — the index it either tries to match (index ETFs) or promises to beat (active ETFs). The benchmark is the bar. Clearing it, after fees, is harder than it sounds.

Best Low-Cost Index Funds Australia 2026 Guide
No fund manager wrote this article. No issuer is paying for placement. Every number comes from CBOE Australia data as at March 2026. We sort, score and call it like it is.
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026

