Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
Global X Ultra Short Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF (SNAS) — Review & Analysis
SNAS is the only dedicated short Nasdaq 100 ETF on the ASX, targeting approximately -2x the daily return of the Nasdaq 100. AUM is $58.89 million as at May 2026 with a 1.00% p.a. management fee — 32bp cheaper than BBUS (1.32%) which targets the broader S&P 500. The fund uses futures and swaps to achieve negative leveraged exposure, with the position reset daily. Compare SNAS across the short/inverse cohort on our short and inverse ETF page or use the Compare ETFs tool to put SNAS vs BBUS side-by-side.
The investment mechanism is identical to other daily-reset inverse products. When the Nasdaq 100 falls 1% in a day, SNAS targets +2% gains; when the Nasdaq rises 1%, SNAS loses 2%. The leveraged exposure resets every day, which creates volatility decay over multi-day periods — in choppy markets that finish flat, SNAS can still lose meaningful value through compounding effects. The structural mechanics are the same as Betashares' BBUS and BBOZ, and the long-only counterpart is LNAS (Ultra Long Nasdaq, also 1.00%).
SNAS sits in a different niche to the other ASX inverse products. BBOZ and BEAR target ASX 200 exposure; BBUS targets the broad S&P 500 with AUD hedging. SNAS targets the more concentrated Nasdaq 100 — meaning investors using SNAS are expressing a directional bearish view on US tech specifically (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Google), not the broader US market. The fee advantage versus BBUS (32bp lower) reflects Global X's pricing discipline in the leveraged complex space.
SNAS is unhedged for currency. It is a tactical short-term instrument designed for hedging tech-heavy portfolios or expressing concentrated bearish Nasdaq views — not a buy-and-hold position. Holding SNAS long-term has historically destroyed capital because the Nasdaq trends up over time and volatility decay compounds against the position. Our hold vs trade ETFs guide covers the structural risks of daily-reset inverse leveraged ETFs and when tactical short positioning makes sense.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Related Reads

How Do Leveraged (Geared) ETFs Work in Australia? A Clear Guide for 2026
Leveraged ASX ETFs use internal gearing to amplify market returns without personal borrowing or margin calls. Here's a 5 minute explanation of how, when and why you could use leveraged ETFs as part of your investment portfolio.

Which ETFs Should You Hold Long Term — and Which Should You Trade?
Not all ETFs are built the same way. A broad market index fund like VAS and a thematic fund like HACK might both be called "ETFs," but they behave very differently. One is designed to hold long term. The other might require active management.
Similar ETFs
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026

