Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF (GRIN) — Review & Analysis
GRIN is VanEck's specialist India fund using a GARP (growth at a reasonable price) selection methodology — companies are screened on growth metrics blended with valuation discipline to find names that are growing fast but not priced for perfection. AUM is $14.98 million as at May 2026, with a 0.75% p.a. management fee. The fund listed on 24 April 2025, so it has just over a year of trading history. Compare GRIN across the full India universe on our India ETF page.
The four other India ETFs on the ASX each express a different philosophy, and GRIN's GARP angle is meaningfully different from all of them. NDIA tracks the Nifty 50 by market cap with no quality, value or growth screens. IIND applies a quality factor screen — profitability, low debt, earnings stability — which tilts toward defensive consumer brands and IT services. GRIN explicitly targets growth-oriented names trading at reasonable multiples, which produces a much more cyclical, mid-cap-tilted portfolio than IIND. The actively managed options (FIIN and IAEF) use discretionary stock selection rather than rules-based factor screens.
GRIN's portfolio composition reveals just how different the GARP screen is. Financials sit at 31% — but the names are public-sector and regional banks (State Bank of India, Bank of India, Union Bank, Canara Bank, Karur Vysya) rather than the private-bank champions (HDFC, ICICI) that dominate NDIA and IIND. Industrials at 26% is a much heavier weighting than the Nifty 50 carries, capturing India's infrastructure and capital-goods build-out. Materials are 12.5% and Health Care 9.3%. The top 10 holdings make up just 27% of the portfolio — a far more diversified concentration than the cap-weighted alternatives where the top 10 typically reach 50%+.
That construction creates a fundamentally different return pattern. Cap-weighted India ETFs are dominated by private banks, IT services majors and Reliance Industries; GRIN is dominated by public sector banks, industrial cyclicals and infrastructure plays — companies that benefit from the government's capex programs and the recapitalisation of state-owned banks. The fund is unhedged. Our best Asia, China and emerging markets ETFs guide covers how factor-based funds like GRIN compare against the rest of the regional landscape.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Symbol | Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|---|
| NACL IN | National Aluminium Co Ltd | 3.33% |
| KVB IN | Karur Vysya Bank Ltd/The | 3.02% |
| BOI IN | Bank Of India | 2.82% |
| UNBK IN | Union Bank Of India | 2.72% |
| CBK IN | Canara Bank | 2.65% |
| SHCR IN | Sharda Cropchem Ltd | 2.62% |
| SBIN IN | State Bank Of India | 2.56% |
| GVTD IN | Alstom T&D India Ltd | 2.54% |
| INDUSTOW IN | Indus Towers Ltd | 2.48% |
| BOMH IN | Bank Of Maharashtra | 2.43% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Financials | 31.4% |
| Industrials | 26.2% |
| Materials | 12.5% |
| Information Technology | 9.5% |
| Health Care | 9.3% |
| Communication Services | 4.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.7% |
| Energy | 2% |
| Real Estate | 1.6% |
| Other/Cash | -0.7% |
Similar ETFs
| Stock | Name | 1 Year % |
|---|---|---|
| ASAO | abrdn Sustainable Asian Opportunities Active ETF | +41.20% |
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026


