Betashares Western Asset Aus Bond Active ETF (BNDS) Review & Analysis

MER Β· Top 50%AUM Β· Top 25%1Y Return Β· #297 of 4263Y Return Β· #264 of 3005Y Return Β· #192 of 225
What's new this monthData to 30 September 2026
  • βˆ’0.9% in September (total return), behind the median Australian bonds ETF at βˆ’0.4%.
  • Investors added a net $11m (1.3% of the fund).
  • The unit price closed the month at $22.79, 6% below its 12-month high (range $22.63 to $24.21).

About BNDS

BNDS is an actively managed Australian bond fund, run by Western Asset Management and offered through Betashares. It aims to beat the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index by investing in Australian government, semi-government, supranational and high-quality corporate bonds, with the manager adjusting the mix and interest rate exposure along the way.

The portfolio is investment grade, so default risk is low, and returns are driven mainly by interest rates. When rates rise, bond prices fall; when they fall, prices rise. The active manager's choices on which bonds to hold and how long their maturities should be can lift or lower results compared with the index. BNDS pays income monthly, which is unfranked, and there is no meaningful currency risk. Its fee is higher than index bond funds, so the manager needs to add value to make up the difference.

BNDS may suit investors wanting an active core holding for the defensive part of a portfolio. Index alternatives include IAF and VAF, and FIXD is another active option; see IAF vs BNDS and BNDS vs HCRD.

BNDS distributions and dividend dates

BNDS pays distributions monthly, with payment about 15 days after the ex-date. (Pattern estimated from recent payments.)

The latest distribution was $0.1042 per unit (0% franked), ex-distribution on 2 November 2026 and paid on 17 November 2026. To receive it you need to own BNDS before the ex-date.

Its distribution yield over the past 12 months is about 4.8%. Distributions vary and past payments are not a guide to future ones.

From ASX announcements, updated nightly. See every ETF in the dividend calendar.

Compare BNDS with

BNDS price by TradingView

Stock CodeBNDS
Fund ManagerBetashares
Asset ClassAustralian bonds
AUM$836m
MER (%)0.42%
Net flows (Sep)+$11m
Last Price$22.79
52-Week Range$22.63 – $24.21
Bid/Ask Spread0.09%
Listing Date16/11/2018
ExchangeASX
Benchmark indexBloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index
Issuer websiteBetashares β†—

Performance (% return)

-1%3%7%12%1M-0.9%1Y-0.4%3Y11.5%5Y-0.3%
1 monthβˆ’0.9%
1 yearβˆ’0.4%
3 years p.a.+3.7%
5 years p.a.βˆ’0.1%

$10,000 invested…

1 year ago$9,9583 years ago$11,1525 years ago$9,966

Value at 30 September 2026 with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage.

Total returns including distributions, to 30 September 2026. 1M, 1Y, 3Y and 5Y bars are cumulative.

BNDS at a glance: strengths and things to watch

πŸ‘ Strengths

  • Nothing stands out against its category.

⚠️ Things to watch

  • Higher fee. At 0.42% a year it costs more than 80% of Australian bonds ETFs (median 0.25%), or about $17 a year more on every $10,000.
  • Behind its peers. βˆ’0.1% a year over 5 years, against +1.0% for the median Australian bonds ETF.

Worked out from BNDS's fees, size, flows, returns and trend against the 59 Australian bonds ETFs in Australia, to 30 September 2026. General information, not a recommendation.

Joshua StegaetfadviserTrend check
Base since 21 Oct 2026

BNDS is in a base. Here's why that matters.

BNDS's moving averages are tangled and the price is moving sideways. The trend hasn't picked a direction yet.

Why it matters: Bases are where the next big move starts. A breakout can begin a new uptrend, while a breakdown can start a long fall. Buying a satellite before the breakout often means waiting months for nothing to happen.

At ETF Adviser the core of a portfolio stays invested through every stage, and satellite ETFs are only bought in an uptrend. Members get a weekly update on which ETFs are breaking out of a base and which trends have broken.

Why no chart? Bond, cash and currency fund prices drop each time a distribution is paid, so a price chart makes them look worse than they are. Check the total returns above instead.

Read more at etfadviser.com.au β†’

BNDS vs its benchmark

How BNDS has done against the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index, after fees. For an index fund, a small shortfall roughly the size of the fee is normal.

BNDSBenchmarkDifference
1 year+0.17%+0.39%-0.22%
3 years p.a.+4.99%+4.60%+0.39%
5 years p.a.+1.07%+0.96%+0.11%

Issuer figures to 30 October 2026, fund returns after fees. Source: Betashares. Compare more ETFs vs their benchmark β†’

Investment Focus

Themes & Sectors

Active ETFsBonds & fixed income

Portfolio Breakdown

Top 10 holdings (14.7% of the fund)

SymbolCompany% assets
2.10%
1.60%
1.60%
1.40%
1.40%
1.40%
1.30%
1.30%
1.30%
1.30%

Sector breakdown

  • Bonds & cash100.0%

Holdings from the issuer's published portfolio. Compare BNDS's holdings with other ETFs β†’

Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.

Similar ETFs

CodeNameSame holdingsMERAUM1Y3Y p.a.5Y p.a.
FEIFWestern Asset Enhanced Income Fund – Active ETF Active–0.50%$580m–––
HCRDBetashares Interest Rate Hedged Aus Corp Bond ETF Currency hedged–0.29%$365m+3.6%+6.6%–
IAFiShares Core Composite Bond ETF–0.10%$3.7bnβˆ’0.4%+3.4%βˆ’0.2%
QPONBetashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF–0.22%$2.4bn+4.6%+5.0%+3.8%
CREDBetashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF–0.25%$1.9bnβˆ’1.2%+5.7%+0.5%
OZBDBetashares Australian Composite Bond ETF–0.19%$1.5bnβˆ’0.8%+4.1%–

Same holdings is the share of BNDS's money in companies the other ETF also holds, weighted by size. No other ETF shares much with BNDS, so these are ETFs in the same category. See every ETF like BNDS β†’

BNDS vs its closest alternatives

What actually differs between BNDS and the ETFs most like it. Data to 30 Sep 2026.

FEIF Western Asset Enhanced Income Fund – Active ETF

  • BNDS is cheaper (0.42% vs 0.50%), worth about $5,332 on $100,000 over 20 years.

Full BNDS vs FEIF comparison β†’

HCRD Betashares Interest Rate Hedged Aus Corp Bond ETF

  • HCRD is cheaper (0.29% vs 0.42%), worth about $8,828 on $100,000 over 20 years.
  • Over 3 years, a year: BNDS +3.7%, HCRD +6.6% (HCRD ahead by 2.9 percentage points).
  • BNDS is about 2 times larger ($836m vs $365m), which usually means tighter trading spreads.
  • Different structure: BNDS is actively managed, HCRD is currency hedged.

Full BNDS vs HCRD comparison β†’

IAF iShares Core Composite Bond ETF

  • IAF is cheaper (0.10% vs 0.42%), worth about $22,103 on $100,000 over 20 years.
  • Over 3 years, a year: BNDS +3.7%, IAF +3.4% (almost identical).
  • IAF is about 4 times larger ($3.7bn vs $836m), which usually means tighter trading spreads.
  • Different structure: BNDS is actively managed, IAF is a standard fund.

Full BNDS vs IAF comparison β†’

General information only. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Popular comparisons

BNDS vs FEIFBNDS vs HCRDIAF vs BNDS

BNDS FAQs

What is the fee for BNDS?

BNDS charges a management fee (MER) of 0.42% a year, according to the TMX Australia monthly funds report as at 30 September 2026.

How big is BNDS?

BNDS had $836m in funds under management as at 30 September 2026.

How has BNDS performed?

BNDS returned βˆ’0.4% over the year to 30 September 2026 (total return, including distributions). Over three years it returned +3.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Who manages BNDS?

BNDS is managed by Betashares and has been listed since November 2018.

Disclaimer

This review is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider the Betashares product disclosure statement (PDS) and target market determination (TMD) before investing. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.