Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
Global Defence ETF (ARMR) — Review & Analysis
ARMR is BetaShares' answer to the global defence theme, with AUM of $256.61 million as at May 2026 and a 0.55% p.a. management fee — 10bp cheaper than DFND and 5bp above DTEC. The fund listed on 4 October 2024, just three weeks after DFND, and the two went head-to-head competing for the early flows into the ASX defence theme. ARMR's portfolio is concentrated — the top 10 holdings make up 66.7% of assets, much more concentrated than DFND. Compare ARMR across the full defence cohort on our defence and aerospace ETF page.
The composition tells the most useful story when comparing ARMR to its peers. ARMR's top 5 holdings are all US defence primes — Lockheed Martin (9.7%), Northrop Grumman (8.2%), Raytheon (8.0%), Safran (7.2%, French), General Dynamics (7.2%) — a much more traditional Western-defence-prime tilt than DFND, which spreads heavily into Korean, Italian, Swedish and Israeli companies. ARMR captures the institutional defence-incumbent thesis: large prime contractors with multi-decade government supply relationships, deep moats, and long-cycle revenue visibility.
ARMR sits at 85.3% Aerospace & Defence with the remainder in application software (Palantir at 5.6% being the main name), research and consulting services, and a small slice of construction and transport machinery (Rheinmetall sits in this classification). The thesis is straightforward: NATO defence budgets are rising structurally, replenishment cycles are accelerating after Ukraine-related drawdowns, and US primes are the dominant suppliers in those procurement chains. Lockheed Martin's F-35 program, Northrop's B-21, and Raytheon's missile portfolios all sit at the heart of that build-out.
The 0.55% p.a. fee makes ARMR the middle option on cost — meaningfully cheaper than DFND's 0.65% but 5bp above DTEC's 0.50%. For investors who specifically want concentrated US-prime defence exposure rather than the broader geographic spread DFND offers, ARMR is the cleaner expression. The fund is unhedged. Our best ETFs in Australia 2026 guide ranks thematic options alongside core funds and covers where defence has sat in the leaderboard during the post-Ukraine rerating.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| SAFRAN SA | 8.50% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 8.20% |
| RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP | 7.70% |
| GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP | 7.50% |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | 7.00% |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP | 6.30% |
| BAE SYSTEMS PLC | 6.20% |
| ROCKET LAB CORP | 5.50% |
| RHEINMETALL AG | 5.20% |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC | 4.70% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Aerospace & Defense | 85.3% |
| Application Software | 7.5% |
| Research & Consulting Services | 5.9% |
| Construction & Transport Machinery | 1.3% |
Similar ETFs
| Stock | Name | 1 Year % |
|---|---|---|
| DFND | VanEck Global Defence ETF | +9.93% |
| DTEC | Defence Tech ETF | +7.99% |
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026


