βš”οΈ Head to head

VGS vs FANG: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

FANG comes out ahead on 6 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVGS wins
VGS
0.18%
FANG
0.35%

Worth about $11,731 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundVGS wins
VGS
$18.7bn
FANG
$1.8bn

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnFANG wins
VGS
+10.1%
FANG
+10.6%
πŸ“Š3-year returnFANG wins
VGS
+17.9% a yr
FANG
+32.2% a yr
🏁5-year returnFANG wins
VGS
+11.8% a yr
FANG
+20.9% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeToo close to call
VGS
0.02%
FANG
0.05%

VGS vs FANG side by side

VGS leads on 3, FANG on 6VGSVanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETFFANGGlobal X FANG+ ETF
The basics
Index trackedMSCI World ex Australia IndexNYSE FANG+ Index
Fund managerVanguardGlobal X
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedNov 2014Mar 2020
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.18%βœ“0.35%
AUMfund size$18.7bnβœ“$1.8bn
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$532mβœ“βˆ’$3.8m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%0.05%
Total returns
1 month+1.9%+4.7%βœ“
1 year+10.1%+10.6%βœ“
3 years p.a.+17.9%+32.2%βœ“
5 years p.a.+11.8%+20.9%βœ“
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,007$11,061βœ“
5 years ago$17,457$25,809βœ“

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

VGS vs FANG price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into VGS 5 years ago is worth $17,457 today, against $25,809 in FANG. That is $8,352 more in FANG.

VGSFANG$10,000 invested
$0k$8k$15k$22k$30k$11.0k$11.1k1 year agoFANG +$54$16.4k$23.1k3 years agoFANG +$6,693$17.5k$25.8k5 years agoFANG +$8,352

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VGS's lower fee leaves about $11,731 more in your pocket over 20 years.

VGS charges 0.18% a yearFANG charges 0.35% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
VGS
βˆ’$1,176
FANG
βˆ’$2,279
You keep$1,103more with VGS
10 years
VGS
βˆ’$3,284
FANG
βˆ’$6,341
You keep$3,056more with VGS
20 years
VGS
βˆ’$12,814
FANG
βˆ’$24,544
You keep$11,731more with VGS

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

VGS and FANG overlap

28%portfolio overlap (moderate)

10 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.

Biggest shared holdings% of VGS% of FANG
5.81%10.15%
5.42%10.66%
4.01%10.99%
4.00%8.41%
2.67%10.07%
1.76%9.42%
1.76%10.32%
1.33%10.24%
0.45%11.45%
0.32%8.25%

Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs β†’

Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.

Free PDF report

Get the full VGS vs FANG report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, VGS or FANG?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers VGS wins on 3 measures and FANG on 6. VGS is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.18% vs 0.35%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $11,731. VGS is the larger fund at $18.7bn vs $1.8bn. FANG has the better 1-year return: +10.6% vs +10.1%.

Which is cheaper, VGS or FANG?

VGS charges 0.18% a year and FANG charges 0.35% a year.

Can I hold both VGS and FANG?

You can, but check how much they overlap. VGS is a international shares fund and FANG is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

VGS vs IVVVGS vs BGBLVGS vs VTSVGS vs VGADVGS vs VEUVGS vs IWLDVGS vs IOOVGS vs QUALVAS vs VGSVGS vs DHHFVGS vs QHALVGS vs DGCEVGS vs V1ACVGS vs TLRAVGS vs HACKVGS vs VESG

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.