STW vs QOZ: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
QOZ comes out ahead on 7 of 10 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $24,327 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.
STW vs QOZ side by side
| STW leads on 3, QOZ on 7 | STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | QOZBetashares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | S&P/ASX 200 Index | FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index |
| Fund manager | State Street (SPDR) | Betashares |
| Asset class | Australian shares | Australian shares |
| Listed | Aug 2001 | Jul 2013 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.05%✓ | 0.40% |
| AUMfund size | $6.5bn✓ | $1.4bn |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | −$33m | $35m✓ |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.03%✓ | 0.07% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −2.4% | −1.2%✓ |
| 1 year | +2.6% | +12.7%✓ |
| 3 years p.a. | +11.0% | +14.7%✓ |
| 5 years p.a. | +6.7% | +9.5%✓ |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,261 | $11,267✓ |
| 5 years ago | $13,821 | $15,764✓ |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
STW vs QOZ price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into STW 5 years ago is worth $13,821 today, against $15,764 in QOZ. That is $1,943 more in QOZ.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
STW's lower fee leaves about $24,327 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
STW and QOZ overlap
142 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of STW | % of QOZ |
|---|---|---|
| 10.83% | 12.54% | |
| 10.34% | 6.31% | |
| 4.67% | 4.68% | |
| 4.55% | 5.21% | |
| 4.78% | 4.49% | |
| 3.56% | 3.38% | |
| 3.21% | 2.89% | |
| 2.34% | 4.44% | |
| 3.22% | 2.11% | |
| 2.03% | 2.30% | |
| 1.82% | 3.24% | |
| 1.45% | 1.64% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full STW vs QOZ report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, STW or QOZ?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers STW wins on 3 measures and QOZ on 7. STW is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.05% vs 0.40%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $24,327. STW is the larger fund at $6.5bn vs $1.4bn. QOZ has the better 1-year return: +12.7% vs +2.6%.
Which is cheaper, STW or QOZ?
STW charges 0.05% a year and QOZ charges 0.40% a year.
Can I hold both STW and QOZ?
You can, but check how much they overlap. STW is a Australian shares fund and QOZ is a Australian shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.