STW vs E200: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
E200 comes out ahead on 6 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.
STW vs E200 side by side
| STW leads on 3, E200 on 6 | STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | E200State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | S&P/ASX 200 Index | S&P/ASX 200 ESG Index |
| Fund manager | State Street (SPDR) | State Street (SPDR) |
| Asset class | Australian shares | Australian shares |
| Listed | Aug 2001 | Aug 2020 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| AUMfund size | $6.5bn✓ | $474m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | −$33m | $74m✓ |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.03%✓ | 0.11% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −2.4% | −2.1%✓ |
| 1 year | +2.6% | +3.0%✓ |
| 3 years p.a. | +11.0%✓ | +10.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | +6.7% | +7.0%✓ |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,261 | $10,299✓ |
| 5 years ago | $13,821 | $14,006✓ |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
STW vs E200 price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into STW 5 years ago is worth $13,821 today, against $14,006 in E200. That is $185 more in E200.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
STW and E200 charge the same fee, so fees make no difference between them.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
STW and E200 overlap
97 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of STW | % of E200 |
|---|---|---|
| 10.34% | 15.57% | |
| 4.78% | 7.21% | |
| 4.67% | 7.03% | |
| 3.56% | 5.41% | |
| 3.22% | 4.86% | |
| 3.21% | 4.87% | |
| 2.34% | 3.52% | |
| 2.06% | 3.08% | |
| 2.03% | 3.04% | |
| 1.82% | 2.73% | |
| 1.62% | 2.41% | |
| 1.45% | 2.17% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full STW vs E200 report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, STW or E200?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers STW wins on 3 measures and E200 on 6. STW is the larger fund at $6.5bn vs $474m. E200 has the better 1-year return: +3.0% vs +2.6%. STW has the better 3-year return: +11.0% a year vs +10.5%.
Which is cheaper, STW or E200?
STW charges 0.05% a year and E200 charges 0.05% a year.
Can I hold both STW and E200?
You can, but check how much they overlap. STW is a Australian shares fund and E200 is a Australian shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.