Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.
BetaShares FTSE 100 Currency Hedged ETF (H100) — Review & Analysis
H100 is the currency-hedged version of F100 — same FTSE 100 exposure with the GBP/AUD effect neutralised. AUM is $22.51 million as at May 2026 with a 0.48% p.a. management fee — just 3bp above unhedged F100 (0.45%). Compare H100 across the Europe cohort on our Europe ETF page, or use the Compare ETFs tool to compare H100 vs F100 directly.
The H100 vs F100 decision is the cleanest currency-hedging case study on the ASX. Both funds track the same FTSE 100 index, both hold the same companies (AstraZeneca, Shell, HSBC, BP, Unilever, Rio Tinto), and both are managed by Betashares. The only meaningful difference is the FX overlay — H100 strips out GBP/AUD movements while F100 keeps them.
The 3bp fee differential between H100 (0.48%) and F100 (0.45%) is extremely tight — meaning Betashares is essentially offering the hedge at near-cost. When the AUD rallies against the GBP, H100 outperforms; when the AUD weakens, F100 outperforms because the unhedged GBP exposure adds to returns. Over multi-decade periods these tend to balance out, but in any 1-3 year window the FX moves can produce 5-15% gaps between the two.
H100 is the right choice for investors who want pure FTSE 100 equity returns without the GBP/AUD overlay — typically retirees taking AUD distributions or those running explicit FX management at the portfolio level. The fund pays semi-annual distributions. Our hedged vs unhedged ETFs guide covers the H100 vs F100 trade-off and the broader FX hedging framework.
Performance (% return)

Investment Focus
Themes
Exposure Regions
Portfolio Breakdown
| Company Name | % assets |
|---|---|
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 9.30% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC | 8.10% |
| SHELL PLC | 7.30% |
| ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC | 4.20% |
| BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC | 3.60% |
| UNILEVER PLC | 3.50% |
| BP PLC | 3.40% |
| RIO TINTO PLC | 3.20% |
| GSK PLC | 3.00% |
| BARCLAYS PLC | 2.60% |
| Sector | % assets |
|---|---|
| Financials | 25.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 16.7% |
| Industrials | 15.1% |
| Health Care | 12.5% |
| Energy | 9.6% |
| Materials | 7.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5% |
| Utilities | 4.5% |
| Communication Services | 2.2% |
| Other | 1.9% |
Similar ETFs
Disclaimer
The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.
No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.
The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.
ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.
This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.
Last updated: January 2026


