ReviewETF Logo

Performance data is updated to 31 May 2026.

BetaShares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF (GNDQ) — Review & Analysis

GNDQ takes a different approach to amplified Nasdaq 100 returns — using internal margin gearing at 30-40% loan-to-value rather than the daily-reset derivative leverage of products like LNAS. AUM is $77.18 million as at May 2026 with a 0.50% p.a. management fee. Compare GNDQ across the tech cohort on our tech ETF page or use the Compare ETFs tool to evaluate against NDQ and LNAS.

The internal gearing mechanism is structurally different from LNAS's daily-reset derivative leverage. GNDQ borrows at the fund level to buy additional Nasdaq 100 exposure — meaning a $1 investor allocation gets roughly $1.30-$1.50 of underlying Nasdaq exposure. The leverage is not reset daily, which avoids the volatility decay that affects LNAS and other daily-leveraged products. The trade-off is that GNDQ carries explicit borrowing costs (the interest paid on the internal loan), which drag on returns when leverage doesn't pay off.

GNDQ competes most directly with LNAS (Ultra Long Nasdaq, 1.00%) as an alternative way to express amplified-return views on the Nasdaq 100. LNAS provides cleaner 2x daily exposure but suffers from volatility decay; GNDQ provides lower leverage (~1.3-1.5x) but without the daily-reset issue, making it more suitable for medium-term holds. The 50bp fee differential (GNDQ vs LNAS at 1.00%) is also meaningful.

GNDQ is unhedged. The fund is structured as a long-term wealth accumulation product rather than tactical positioning — its name "Wealth Builder" reflects the intended use case. Our hold vs trade ETFs guide covers when geared vs leveraged structures suit different investor objectives.

Stock Code
GNDQ
Fund Manager
Betashares
Asset Class
Equities
AUM
$77.18M
MER (%)
0.50%
Listing Date
15/10/2024

Performance (% return)

Advertisement

Investment Focus

Themes

TechnologyLeveraged

Exposure Regions

US

Portfolio Breakdown

Sector% assets
Information Technology52.9%
Communication Services16%
Consumer Discretionary13.4%
Health Care5.4%
Consumer Staples4.6%
Industrials4.4%
Utilities1.4%
Materials1.1%
Energy0.5%
Financials0.3%

Similar ETFs

StockName1 Year %
BEST ETFS US Quality ETF+15.75%

Disclaimer

The information provided on ReviewETF.com.au is intended for general information and comparison purposes only. It is compiled and presented on a best-endeavours basis from publicly available sources, but we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or suitability for any particular purpose.

No content on this website constitutes financial advice, investment recommendation, solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital.

The point of truth for any ETF is always the official product disclosure statement (PDS), website, and announcements from the ETF issuer/provider (e.g., Vanguard, BetaShares, iShares, VanEck, etc.). We link directly to these primary sources on each individual ETF page wherever possible—please verify all details there before making any decisions.

ReviewETF.com.au, its owner (Joshua), and any associated entities disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of, or reliance on, information contained on this site. Users should seek independent professional financial advice tailored to their personal circumstances.

This website may contain links to third-party sites; we are not responsible for their content or privacy practices.

Last updated: January 2026

AIS LogoGNDQ ETF Review | BetaShares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF