WBND vs AESG: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
WBND comes out ahead on 4 of 4 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
WBND vs AESG side by side
| WBND leads on 4, AESG on 0 | WBNDBetashares Global Aggregate Bond Currency H ETF | AESGiShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index | Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate and Green Bond ESG SRI Index, hedged to AUD |
| Fund manager | Betashares | iShares |
| Asset class | International bonds | International bonds |
| Listed | Aug 2025 | Aug 2022 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| AUMfund size | $782m✓ | $455m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $63m✓ | $14m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.07% | 0.08% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −1.7% | −1.7% |
| 1 year | −0.6%✓ | −1.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | – | +3.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | – | – |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $9,940✓ | $9,904 |
| 5 years ago | – | – |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
WBND vs AESG price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
Only AESG has a 3 years record: $10,000 then is worth $11,049 today.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
WBND and AESG charge the same fee, so fees make no difference between them.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
WBND and AESG overlap
1 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of WBND | % of AESG |
|---|---|---|
| 100.00% | 100.00% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full WBND vs AESG report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, WBND or AESG?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers WBND wins on 4 measures and AESG on 0. WBND is the larger fund at $782m vs $455m. WBND has the better 1-year return: −0.6% vs −1.0%.
Which is cheaper, WBND or AESG?
WBND charges 0.19% a year and AESG charges 0.19% a year.
Can I hold both WBND and AESG?
You can, but check how much they overlap. WBND is a international bonds fund and AESG is a international bonds fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.