βš”οΈ Head to head

VSO vs FSML: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

VSO comes out ahead on 5 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVSO wins
VSO
0.30%
FSML
0.85%

Worth about $35,924 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundVSO wins
VSO
$1.2bn
FSML
$638m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnVSO wins
VSO
βˆ’0.1%
FSML
βˆ’1.4%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
VSO
+11.5% a yr
FSML
–
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
VSO
+4.8% a yr
FSML
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeVSO wins
VSO
0.07%
FSML
0.52%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

VSO vs FSML side by side

VSO leads on 5, FSML on 2VSOVanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETFFSMLFiretrail Australian Small Companies Fund – Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedMSCI Australian Shares Small Cap IndexSee the PDS
Fund managerVanguardFiretrail
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedMay 2011Nov 2024
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.30%βœ“0.85%
AUMfund size$1.2bnβœ“$638m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$15m$20mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.07%βœ“0.52%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’2.0%βˆ’1.0%βœ“
1 yearβˆ’0.1%βœ“βˆ’1.4%
3 years p.a.+11.5%–
5 years p.a.+4.8%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$9,993βœ“$9,864
5 years ago$12,644–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

VSO vs FSML price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only VSO has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $12,644 today.

VSOFSML$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$10.0k$9.9k1 year agoVSO +$129$13.9ktoo new3 years ago$12.6ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VSO's lower fee leaves about $35,924 more in your pocket over 20 years.

VSO charges 0.30% a yearFSML charges 0.85% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
VSO
βˆ’$1,955
FSML
βˆ’$5,483
You keep$3,528more with VSO
10 years
VSO
βˆ’$5,446
FSML
βˆ’$15,080
You keep$9,634more with VSO
20 years
VSO
βˆ’$21,131
FSML
βˆ’$57,055
You keep$35,924more with VSO

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full VSO vs FSML report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, VSO or FSML?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers VSO wins on 5 measures and FSML on 2. VSO is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.30% vs 0.85%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $35,924. VSO is the larger fund at $1.2bn vs $638m. VSO has the better 1-year return: βˆ’0.1% vs βˆ’1.4%.

Which is cheaper, VSO or FSML?

VSO charges 0.30% a year and FSML charges 0.85% a year.

Can I hold both VSO and FSML?

You can, but check how much they overlap. VSO is a Australian shares fund and FSML is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VSO vs SMLLVSO vs VLCFSML vs SMLLFSML vs MVSFSML vs VLC

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.