βš”οΈ Head to head

VHY vs RDV: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

VHY comes out ahead on 9 of 10 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVHY wins
VHY
0.25%
RDV
0.34%

Worth about $6,177 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundVHY wins
VHY
$8.2bn
RDV
$342m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnVHY wins
VHY
+12.0%
RDV
+1.9%
πŸ“Š3-year returnVHY wins
VHY
+13.5% a yr
RDV
+11.7% a yr
🏁5-year returnVHY wins
VHY
+10.2% a yr
RDV
+7.0% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeVHY wins
VHY
0.02%
RDV
0.08%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

VHY vs RDV side by side

VHY leads on 9, RDV on 1VHYVanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETFRDVRussell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF
The basics
Index trackedFTSE ASFA Australia High Dividend Yield IndexSee the PDS
Fund managerVanguardRussell Investments
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedMay 2011May 2010
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.25%βœ“0.34%
AUMfund size$8.2bnβœ“$342m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$144mβœ“$1.7m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%βœ“0.08%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’1.1%βˆ’0.5%βœ“
1 year+12.0%βœ“+1.9%
3 years p.a.+13.5%βœ“+11.7%
5 years p.a.+10.2%βœ“+7.0%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,200βœ“$10,192
5 years ago$16,237βœ“$14,041

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

VHY vs RDV price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into VHY 5 years ago is worth $16,237 today, against $14,041 in RDV. That is $2,196 more in VHY.

VHYRDV$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$11.2k$10.2k1 year agoVHY +$1,008$14.6k$13.9k3 years agoVHY +$684$16.2k$14.0k5 years agoVHY +$2,196

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VHY's lower fee leaves about $6,177 more in your pocket over 20 years.

VHY charges 0.25% a yearRDV charges 0.34% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
VHY
βˆ’$1,631
RDV
βˆ’$2,214
You keep$583more with VHY
10 years
VHY
βˆ’$4,548
RDV
βˆ’$6,162
You keep$1,614more with VHY
20 years
VHY
βˆ’$17,687
RDV
βˆ’$23,864
You keep$6,177more with VHY

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full VHY vs RDV report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, VHY or RDV?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers VHY wins on 9 measures and RDV on 1. VHY is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.25% vs 0.34%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $6,177. VHY is the larger fund at $8.2bn vs $342m. VHY has the better 1-year return: +12.0% vs +1.9%.

Which is cheaper, VHY or RDV?

VHY charges 0.25% a year and RDV charges 0.34% a year.

Can I hold both VHY and RDV?

You can, but check how much they overlap. VHY is a Australian shares fund and RDV is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VHY vs SYIVHY vs IHDVHY vs ZYAUVHY vs HVSTA200 vs VHYVAS vs VHYVHY vs HYLDVHY vs YMAXSYI vs RDVRARI vs RDV

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.