βš”οΈ Head to head

VGAD vs TLRH: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

VGAD comes out ahead on 6 of 8 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVGAD wins
VGAD
0.21%
TLRH
1.20%

Worth about $63,233 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundVGAD wins
VGAD
$7.9bn
TLRH
$495m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnTLRH wins
VGAD
+17.1%
TLRH
+17.6%
πŸ“Š3-year returnVGAD wins
VGAD
+19.8% a yr
TLRH
+8.4% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
VGAD
+10.8% a yr
TLRH
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeVGAD wins
VGAD
0.02%
TLRH
0.20%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

VGAD vs TLRH side by side

VGAD leads on 6, TLRH on 2VGADVanguard MSCI Index International Shares (Hedged) ETFTLRHTalaria Global Equity Fund Currency Hedged Complex ETF
The basics
Index trackedMSCI World ex Australia Index, hedged to AUDSee the PDS
Fund managerVanguardTalaria
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedNov 2014Nov 2021
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.21%βœ“1.20%
AUMfund size$7.9bnβœ“$495m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$136mβœ“$15m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%βœ“0.20%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’0.4%βœ“βˆ’1.4%
1 year+17.1%+17.6%βœ“
3 years p.a.+19.8%βœ“+8.4%
5 years p.a.+10.8%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,706$11,761βœ“
5 years ago$16,737–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only VGAD has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $16,737 today.

VGADTLRH$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$11.7k$11.8k1 year agoTLRH +$55$17.2k$12.7k3 years agoVGAD +$4,477$16.7ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VGAD's lower fee leaves about $63,233 more in your pocket over 20 years.

VGAD charges 0.21% a yearTLRH charges 1.20% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
VGAD
βˆ’$1,371
TLRH
βˆ’$7,690
You keep$6,319more with VGAD
10 years
VGAD
βˆ’$3,827
TLRH
βˆ’$20,981
You keep$17,154more with VGAD
20 years
VGAD
βˆ’$14,910
TLRH
βˆ’$78,143
You keep$63,233more with VGAD

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full VGAD vs TLRH report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, VGAD or TLRH?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers VGAD wins on 6 measures and TLRH on 2. VGAD is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.21% vs 1.20%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $63,233. VGAD is the larger fund at $7.9bn vs $495m. TLRH has the better 1-year return: +17.6% vs +17.1%.

Which is cheaper, VGAD or TLRH?

VGAD charges 0.21% a year and TLRH charges 1.20% a year.

Can I hold both VGAD and TLRH?

You can, but check how much they overlap. VGAD is a international shares fund and TLRH is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

VGS vs VGADVGAD vs HGBLVGAD vs QHALVGAD vs QHSMVGAD vs HVLUVGAD vs VESGVGAD vs IJPVGAD vs IVEVGAD vs MSTRVGAD vs HJPNTLRA vs TLRHIHVV vs TLRHDFGH vs TLRH

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.