βš”οΈ Head to head

VDAL vs MAET: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

VDAL comes out ahead on 6 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVDAL wins
VDAL
0.27%
MAET
1.35%

Worth about $67,715 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundVDAL wins
VDAL
$515m
MAET
$374m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnVDAL wins
VDAL
+8.8%
MAET
+2.2%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
VDAL
–
MAET
+19.5% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
VDAL
–
MAET
+8.1% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeVDAL wins
VDAL
0.06%
MAET
0.29%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

VDAL vs MAET side by side

VDAL leads on 6, MAET on 1VDALVanguard Diversified All Growth Index ETFMAETMunro Global Growth Fund Complex ETF
The basics
Index trackedNo single index: a mix of Vanguard index fundsSee the PDS
Fund managerVanguardMunro
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedMar 2025Nov 2020
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.27%βœ“1.35%
AUMfund size$515mβœ“$374m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$33mβœ“$9.2m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.06%βœ“0.29%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’0.3%+0.2%βœ“
1 year+8.8%βœ“+2.2%
3 years p.a.–+19.5%
5 years p.a.–+8.1%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,881βœ“$10,218
5 years ago–$14,741

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

VDAL vs MAET price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only MAET has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $14,741 today.

VDALMAET$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$10.9k$10.2k1 year agoVDAL +$663too new$17.1k3 years agotoo new$14.7k5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VDAL's lower fee leaves about $67,715 more in your pocket over 20 years.

VDAL charges 0.27% a yearMAET charges 1.35% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
VDAL
βˆ’$1,761
MAET
βˆ’$8,627
You keep$6,867more with VDAL
10 years
VDAL
βˆ’$4,908
MAET
βˆ’$23,456
You keep$18,549more with VDAL
20 years
VDAL
βˆ’$19,068
MAET
βˆ’$86,783
You keep$67,715more with VDAL

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full VDAL vs MAET report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, VDAL or MAET?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers VDAL wins on 6 measures and MAET on 1. VDAL is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.27% vs 1.35%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $67,715. VDAL is the larger fund at $515m vs $374m. VDAL has the better 1-year return: +8.8% vs +2.2%.

Which is cheaper, VDAL or MAET?

VDAL charges 0.27% a year and MAET charges 1.35% a year.

Can I hold both VDAL and MAET?

You can, but check how much they overlap. VDAL is a international shares fund and MAET is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

DHHF vs VDALVDHG vs VDALHYGG vs VDALVEU vs VDALIWLD vs VDALMAET vs MCGGHYGG vs MAET

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.