βš”οΈ Head to head

VAS vs ASUS: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

VAS comes out ahead on 5 of 5 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVAS wins
VAS
0.07%
ASUS
0.59%

Worth about $35,480 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundVAS wins
VAS
$26.7bn
ASUS
$405m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnToo close to call
VAS
+2.2%
ASUS
–
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
VAS
+10.8% a yr
ASUS
–
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
VAS
+6.5% a yr
ASUS
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeVAS wins
VAS
0.02%
ASUS
0.60%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

VAS vs ASUS side by side

VAS leads on 5, ASUS on 0VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETFASUSAusbil Active Sustainable Equity Fund
The basics
Index trackedS&P/ASX 300 IndexBenchmark: S&P/ASX 200 Index
Fund managerVanguardAusbil
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedMay 2009May 2026
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.07%βœ“0.59%
AUMfund size$26.7bnβœ“$405m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$449mβœ“βˆ’$14m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%βœ“0.60%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’2.5%βœ“βˆ’3.9%
1 year+2.2%–
3 years p.a.+10.8%–
5 years p.a.+6.5%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,223–
5 years ago$13,672–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

VAS vs ASUS price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only VAS has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $13,672 today.

VASASUS$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$10.2ktoo new1 year ago$13.6ktoo new3 years ago$13.7ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VAS's lower fee leaves about $35,480 more in your pocket over 20 years.

VAS charges 0.07% a yearASUS charges 0.59% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
VAS
βˆ’$458
ASUS
βˆ’$3,824
You keep$3,366more with VAS
10 years
VAS
βˆ’$1,283
ASUS
βˆ’$10,582
You keep$9,299more with VAS
20 years
VAS
βˆ’$5,032
ASUS
βˆ’$40,512
You keep$35,480more with VAS

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full VAS vs ASUS report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, VAS or ASUS?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers VAS wins on 5 measures and ASUS on 0. VAS is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.07% vs 0.59%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $35,480. VAS is the larger fund at $26.7bn vs $405m. VAS has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.02%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, VAS or ASUS?

VAS charges 0.07% a year and ASUS charges 0.59% a year.

Can I hold both VAS and ASUS?

You can, but check how much they overlap. VAS is a Australian shares fund and ASUS is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VAS vs A200VAS vs IOZVAS vs STWVAS vs VGSVAS vs VHYVAS vs MVWVAS vs DAVAVAS vs AQLTVAS vs FAIRVAS vs AASFVAS vs VETHVAS vs RARIDIVI vs ASUSASUS vs GRNV

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.