βš”οΈ Head to head

SYI vs DIVI: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

SYI comes out ahead on 6 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeSYI wins
SYI
0.20%
DIVI
0.85%

Worth about $42,843 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundSYI wins
SYI
$739m
DIVI
$620m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnSYI wins
SYI
+14.8%
DIVI
+7.0%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
SYI
+13.6% a yr
DIVI
–
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
SYI
+9.5% a yr
DIVI
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeSYI wins
SYI
0.06%
DIVI
0.36%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

SYI vs DIVI side by side

SYI leads on 6, DIVI on 1SYIState Street SPDR MSCI Australia Select High Dividend Yield ETFDIVIAusbil Active Dividend Income Fund
The basics
Index trackedMSCI Australia Select High Dividend Yield IndexBenchmark: S&P/ASX 200 Index
Fund managerState Street (SPDR)Ausbil
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedSep 2010Sep 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.20%βœ“0.85%
AUMfund size$739mβœ“$620m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$7.9m$28mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.06%βœ“0.36%
Total returns
1 month+1.7%βœ“βˆ’2.0%
1 year+14.8%βœ“+7.0%
3 years p.a.+13.6%–
5 years p.a.+9.5%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,475βœ“$10,695
5 years ago$15,710–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

SYI vs DIVI price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only SYI has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $15,710 today.

SYIDIVI$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$11.5k$10.7k1 year agoSYI +$780$14.7ktoo new3 years ago$15.7ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

SYI's lower fee leaves about $42,843 more in your pocket over 20 years.

SYI charges 0.20% a yearDIVI charges 0.85% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
SYI
βˆ’$1,306
DIVI
βˆ’$5,483
You keep$4,177more with SYI
10 years
SYI
βˆ’$3,646
DIVI
βˆ’$15,080
You keep$11,434more with SYI
20 years
SYI
βˆ’$14,212
DIVI
βˆ’$57,055
You keep$42,843more with SYI

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full SYI vs DIVI report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, SYI or DIVI?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers SYI wins on 6 measures and DIVI on 1. SYI is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.20% vs 0.85%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $42,843. SYI is the larger fund at $739m vs $620m. SYI has the better 1-year return: +14.8% vs +7.0%.

Which is cheaper, SYI or DIVI?

SYI charges 0.20% a year and DIVI charges 0.85% a year.

Can I hold both SYI and DIVI?

You can, but check how much they overlap. SYI is a Australian shares fund and DIVI is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VHY vs SYISYI vs RDVSYI vs HYLDSYI vs VLCSYI vs IHDDIVI vs IHDDIVI vs ASUS

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.