βš”οΈ Head to head

RARI vs RDV: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

RDV comes out ahead on 8 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeRDV wins
RARI
0.45%
RDV
0.34%

Worth about $7,417 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundRARI wins
RARI
$427m
RDV
$342m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnRDV wins
RARI
βˆ’4.9%
RDV
+1.9%
πŸ“Š3-year returnRDV wins
RARI
+10.6% a yr
RDV
+11.7% a yr
🏁5-year returnRDV wins
RARI
+5.4% a yr
RDV
+7.0% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeToo close to call
RARI
0.11%
RDV
0.08%

RARI vs RDV side by side

RARI leads on 1, RDV on 8RARIRussell Investments Australian Responsible Investment ETFRDVRussell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF
The basics
Index trackedRussell Australia ESG High Dividend IndexSee the PDS
Fund managerRussell InvestmentsRussell Investments
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedApr 2015May 2010
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.45%0.34%βœ“
AUMfund size$427mβœ“$342m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$0.0m$1.7mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.11%0.08%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’2.0%βˆ’0.5%βœ“
1 yearβˆ’4.9%+1.9%βœ“
3 years p.a.+10.6%+11.7%βœ“
5 years p.a.+5.4%+7.0%βœ“
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$9,512$10,192βœ“
5 years ago$13,030$14,041βœ“

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

RARI vs RDV price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into RARI 5 years ago is worth $13,030 today, against $14,041 in RDV. That is $1,011 more in RDV.

RARIRDV$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$9.5k$10.2k1 year agoRDV +$680$13.5k$13.9k3 years agoRDV +$387$13.0k$14.0k5 years agoRDV +$1,011

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

RDV's lower fee leaves about $7,417 more in your pocket over 20 years.

RARI charges 0.45% a yearRDV charges 0.34% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
RARI
βˆ’$2,925
RDV
βˆ’$2,214
You keep$710more with RDV
10 years
RARI
βˆ’$8,118
RDV
βˆ’$6,162
You keep$1,956more with RDV
20 years
RARI
βˆ’$31,281
RDV
βˆ’$23,864
You keep$7,417more with RDV

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full RARI vs RDV report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, RARI or RDV?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers RARI wins on 1 measures and RDV on 8. RDV is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.34% vs 0.45%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $7,417. RARI is the larger fund at $427m vs $342m. RDV has the better 1-year return: +1.9% vs βˆ’4.9%.

Which is cheaper, RARI or RDV?

RARI charges 0.45% a year and RDV charges 0.34% a year.

Can I hold both RARI and RDV?

You can, but check how much they overlap. RARI is a Australian shares fund and RDV is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VAS vs RARIA200 vs RARISYI vs RDVVHY vs RDV

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.