QLTY vs HETH: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
QLTY comes out ahead on 6 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $17,916 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
QLTY vs HETH side by side
| QLTY leads on 6, HETH on 3 | QLTYBetashares Global Quality Leaders ETF | HETHBetashares Global Sustainability Leaders Ch ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders Index | Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, hedged to AUD |
| Fund manager | Betashares | Betashares |
| Asset class | International shares | International shares |
| Listed | Nov 2018 | Jul 2020 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.35%✓ | 0.62% |
| AUMfund size | $1.1bn✓ | $725m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $9.4m✓ | −$3.2m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.08% | 0.13% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | +1.9%✓ | −1.7% |
| 1 year | +8.9% | +14.2%✓ |
| 3 years p.a. | +15.3% | +16.4%✓ |
| 5 years p.a. | +9.2%✓ | +7.9% |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,890 | $11,422✓ |
| 5 years ago | $15,552✓ | $14,606 |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
QLTY vs HETH price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into QLTY 5 years ago is worth $15,552 today, against $14,606 in HETH. That is $946 more in QLTY.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
QLTY's lower fee leaves about $17,916 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
QLTY and HETH overlap
36 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of QLTY | % of HETH |
|---|---|---|
| 5.67% | 4.58% | |
| 4.63% | 3.22% | |
| 1.54% | 1.71% | |
| 2.82% | 1.49% | |
| 2.73% | 1.42% | |
| 1.23% | 1.22% | |
| 1.04% | 1.04% | |
| 1.06% | 0.89% | |
| 1.29% | 0.82% | |
| 0.75% | 0.71% | |
| 0.67% | 0.65% | |
| 0.60% | 0.58% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full QLTY vs HETH report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, QLTY or HETH?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers QLTY wins on 6 measures and HETH on 3. QLTY is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.35% vs 0.62%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $17,916. QLTY is the larger fund at $1.1bn vs $725m. HETH has the better 1-year return: +14.2% vs +8.9%.
Which is cheaper, QLTY or HETH?
QLTY charges 0.35% a year and HETH charges 0.62% a year.
Can I hold both QLTY and HETH?
You can, but check how much they overlap. QLTY is a international shares fund and HETH is a international shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.