QHAL vs WCMQ: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
QHAL comes out ahead on 6 of 10 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $51,106 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.
QHAL vs WCMQ side by side
| QHAL leads on 6, WCMQ on 4 | QHALVanEck MSCI International Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF | WCMQWCM Quality Global Growth Fund – Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index, hedged to AUD | See the PDS |
| Fund manager | VanEck | WCM |
| Asset class | International shares | International shares |
| Listed | Mar 2019 | Sep 2018 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.43%✓ | 1.25% |
| AUMfund size | $2.7bn✓ | $403m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $54m✓ | $2.0m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.04%✓ | 0.29% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | +0.6% | +2.6%✓ |
| 1 year | +16.5%✓ | +3.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | +17.8% | +23.8%✓ |
| 5 years p.a. | +9.7% | +10.2%✓ |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $11,650✓ | $10,366 |
| 5 years ago | $15,863 | $16,270✓ |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
QHAL vs WCMQ price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into QHAL 5 years ago is worth $15,863 today, against $16,270 in WCMQ. That is $407 more in WCMQ.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
QHAL's lower fee leaves about $51,106 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
Get the full QHAL vs WCMQ report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, QHAL or WCMQ?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers QHAL wins on 6 measures and WCMQ on 4. QHAL is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.43% vs 1.25%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $51,106. QHAL is the larger fund at $2.7bn vs $403m. QHAL has the better 1-year return: +16.5% vs +3.7%.
Which is cheaper, QHAL or WCMQ?
QHAL charges 0.43% a year and WCMQ charges 1.25% a year.
Can I hold both QHAL and WCMQ?
You can, but check how much they overlap. QHAL is a international shares fund and WCMQ is a international shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.