βš”οΈ Head to head

QGFH vs QGRU: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

QGRU comes out ahead on 3 of 5 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The big difference is currency. QGRU is currency hedged, so its returns ignore moves in the Australian dollar. QGFH is unhedged: it does better when the dollar falls and worse when it rises.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeQGRU wins
QGFH
0.92%
QGRU
0.88%

Worth about $2,464 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundQGFH wins
QGFH
$537m
QGRU
$458m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

βš–οΈCheaper to tradeQGFH wins
QGFH
0.40%
QGRU
0.52%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

QGFH vs QGRU side by side

QGFH leads on 2, QGRU on 3QGFHQuay Global Real Estate Fund (Aud) Active ETFQGRUQuay Global Real Estate Fund (Unhedged) Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerQuayQuay
Asset classProperty & infrastructureProperty & infrastructure
ListedNov 2025Nov 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.92%0.88%βœ“
AUMfund size$537mβœ“$458m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$5.6mβˆ’$0.6mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.40%βœ“0.52%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’4.6%βˆ’3.9%βœ“
1 year––
3 years p.a.––
5 years p.a.––
$10,000 invested
1 year ago––
5 years ago––

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

QGFH vs QGRU price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

QGRU's lower fee leaves about $2,464 more in your pocket over 20 years.

QGFH charges 0.92% a yearQGRU charges 0.88% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
QGFH
βˆ’$5,927
QGRU
βˆ’$5,673
You keep$253more with QGRU
10 years
QGFH
βˆ’$16,274
QGRU
βˆ’$15,593
You keep$682more with QGRU
20 years
QGFH
βˆ’$61,379
QGRU
βˆ’$58,915
You keep$2,464more with QGRU

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full QGFH vs QGRU report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, QGFH or QGRU?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers QGFH wins on 2 measures and QGRU on 3. QGRU is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.88% vs 0.92%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $2,464. QGFH is the larger fund at $537m vs $458m. QGFH has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.40%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, QGFH or QGRU?

QGFH charges 0.92% a year and QGRU charges 0.88% a year.

Can I hold both QGFH and QGRU?

You can, but check how much they overlap. QGFH is a property & infrastructure fund and QGRU is a property & infrastructure fund.

More comparisons

QGFH vs DJREIFRA vs QGFHDJRE vs QGRUGIFL vs QGRU

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.