βš”οΈ Head to head

QGFH vs DJRE: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

DJRE comes out ahead on 4 of 5 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeDJRE wins
QGFH
0.92%
DJRE
0.20%

Worth about $47,167 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundQGFH wins
QGFH
$537m
DJRE
$509m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnToo close to call
QGFH
–
DJRE
+1.3%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
QGFH
–
DJRE
+6.8% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
QGFH
–
DJRE
+1.4% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeDJRE wins
QGFH
0.40%
DJRE
0.11%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

QGFH vs DJRE side by side

QGFH leads on 1, DJRE on 4QGFHQuay Global Real Estate Fund (Aud) Active ETFDJREState Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerQuayState Street (SPDR)
Asset classProperty & infrastructureProperty & infrastructure
ListedNov 2025Nov 2013
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.92%0.20%βœ“
AUMfund size$537mβœ“$509m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$5.6m$7.5mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.40%0.11%βœ“
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’4.6%βˆ’2.1%βœ“
1 year–+1.3%
3 years p.a.–+6.8%
5 years p.a.–+1.4%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago–$10,128
5 years ago–$10,733

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

QGFH vs DJRE price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only DJRE has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $10,733 today.

QGFHDJRE$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16ktoo new$10.1k1 year agotoo new$12.2k3 years agotoo new$10.7k5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

DJRE's lower fee leaves about $47,167 more in your pocket over 20 years.

QGFH charges 0.92% a yearDJRE charges 0.20% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
QGFH
βˆ’$5,927
DJRE
βˆ’$1,306
You keep$4,621more with DJRE
10 years
QGFH
βˆ’$16,274
DJRE
βˆ’$3,646
You keep$12,628more with DJRE
20 years
QGFH
βˆ’$61,379
DJRE
βˆ’$14,212
You keep$47,167more with DJRE

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full QGFH vs DJRE report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, QGFH or DJRE?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers QGFH wins on 1 measures and DJRE on 4. DJRE is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.20% vs 0.92%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $47,167. QGFH is the larger fund at $537m vs $509m. DJRE has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.11%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, QGFH or DJRE?

QGFH charges 0.92% a year and DJRE charges 0.20% a year.

Can I hold both QGFH and DJRE?

You can, but check how much they overlap. QGFH is a property & infrastructure fund and DJRE is a property & infrastructure fund.

More comparisons

QGFH vs QGRUIFRA vs QGFHDJRE vs QGRUGIFL vs DJRE

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.