βš”οΈ Head to head

PGI2 vs R3AL: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

PGI2 comes out ahead on 4 of 4 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeToo close to call
PGI2
0.85%
R3AL
0.85%
🏦Bigger fundPGI2 wins
PGI2
$429m
R3AL
$408m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnToo close to call
PGI2
–
R3AL
βˆ’5.6%
βš–οΈCheaper to tradePGI2 wins
PGI2
0.14%
R3AL
0.41%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

PGI2 vs R3AL side by side

PGI2 leads on 4, R3AL on 0PGI2Plato Global Shares Income Fund – Active ETFR3ALClearBridge Real Income Fund - Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerPlatoClearBridge
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedMay 2026Jan 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.85%0.85%
AUMfund size$429mβœ“$408m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$54mβœ“βˆ’$5.5m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.14%βœ“0.41%
Total returns
1 month+1.3%βœ“βˆ’4.9%
1 yearβ€“βˆ’5.6%
3 years p.a.––
5 years p.a.––
$10,000 invested
1 year ago–$9,438
5 years ago––

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

PGI2 vs R3AL price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only R3AL has a 1 year record: $10,000 then is worth $9,438 today.

PGI2R3AL$10,000 invested
$0k$3k$6k$9k$12ktoo new$9.4k1 year ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

PGI2 and R3AL charge the same fee, so fees make no difference between them.

PGI2 charges 0.85% a yearR3AL charges 0.85% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
PGI2
βˆ’$5,483
R3AL
βˆ’$5,483
Same cost
10 years
PGI2
βˆ’$15,080
R3AL
βˆ’$15,080
Same cost
20 years
PGI2
βˆ’$57,055
R3AL
βˆ’$57,055
Same cost

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full PGI2 vs R3AL report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, PGI2 or R3AL?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers PGI2 wins on 4 measures and R3AL on 0. PGI2 is the larger fund at $429m vs $408m. PGI2 has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.14%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, PGI2 or R3AL?

PGI2 charges 0.85% a year and R3AL charges 0.85% a year.

Can I hold both PGI2 and R3AL?

You can, but check how much they overlap. PGI2 is a international shares fund and R3AL is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

PGA1 vs PGI2PGI2 vs JEPIR3AL vs JEPIR3AL vs JPEQ

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.