NDQ vs IOO: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
NDQ comes out ahead on 5 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $5,351 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
NDQ vs IOO side by side
| NDQ leads on 5, IOO on 4 | NDQBetashares Nasdaq 100 ETF | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | Nasdaq-100 Index | S&P Global 100 Index |
| Fund manager | Betashares | iShares |
| Asset class | International shares | International shares |
| Listed | May 2015 | Oct 2007 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.48% | 0.40%β |
| AUMfund size | $9.5bnβ | $6.1bn |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | β$9.5m | $11mβ |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | +5.9%β | +2.6% |
| 1 year | +16.6%β | +15.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | +23.8%β | +22.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | +15.3% | +16.4%β |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $11,663β | $11,555 |
| 5 years ago | $20,407 | $21,345β |
β marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
NDQ vs IOO price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into NDQ 5 years ago is worth $20,407 today, against $21,345 in IOO. That is $938 more in IOO.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
IOO's lower fee leaves about $5,351 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
NDQ and IOO overlap
14 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of NDQ | % of IOO |
|---|---|---|
| 8.18% | 12.39% | |
| 8.02% | 12.19% | |
| 6.30% | 9.54% | |
| 5.17% | 7.30% | |
| 4.22% | 5.81% | |
| 2.52% | 3.82% | |
| 2.70% | 1.36% | |
| 1.85% | 1.01% | |
| 1.55% | 0.81% | |
| 1.23% | 0.68% | |
| 1.06% | 0.59% | |
| 0.84% | 0.46% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs β
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full NDQ vs IOO report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- β FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter

FAQs
Which is better, NDQ or IOO?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers NDQ wins on 5 measures and IOO on 4. IOO is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.40% vs 0.48%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $5,351. NDQ is the larger fund at $9.5bn vs $6.1bn. NDQ has the better 1-year return: +16.6% vs +15.6%.
Which is cheaper, NDQ or IOO?
NDQ charges 0.48% a year and IOO charges 0.40% a year.
Can I hold both NDQ and IOO?
You can, but check how much they overlap. NDQ is a international shares fund and IOO is a international shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.