βš”οΈ Head to head

IVV vs IACT: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

IACT comes out ahead on 4 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeIVV wins
IVV
0.04%
IACT
0.45%

Worth about $28,398 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundIVV wins
IVV
$14.9bn
IACT
$520m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnIACT wins
IVV
+10.1%
IACT
+11.3%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
IVV
+19.2% a yr
IACT
–
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
IVV
+13.4% a yr
IACT
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeIVV wins
IVV
0.02%
IACT
0.10%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

IVV vs IACT side by side

IVV leads on 3, IACT on 4IVViShares S&P 500 ETFIACTiShares U.S. Factor Rotation Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedS&P 500 IndexSee the PDS
Fund manageriSharesiShares
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedOct 2007Jun 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.04%βœ“0.45%
AUMfund size$14.9bnβœ“$520m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$84m$177mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%βœ“0.10%
Total returns
1 month+2.6%+2.9%βœ“
1 year+10.1%+11.3%βœ“
3 years p.a.+19.2%–
5 years p.a.+13.4%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,012$11,130βœ“
5 years ago$18,779–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

IVV vs IACT price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only IVV has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $18,779 today.

IVVIACT$10,000 invested
$0k$6k$12k$18k$24k$11.0k$11.1k1 year agoIACT +$118$16.9ktoo new3 years ago$18.8ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

IVV's lower fee leaves about $28,398 more in your pocket over 20 years.

IVV charges 0.04% a yearIACT charges 0.45% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
IVV
βˆ’$262
IACT
βˆ’$2,925
You keep$2,663more with IVV
10 years
IVV
βˆ’$734
IACT
βˆ’$8,118
You keep$7,384more with IVV
20 years
IVV
βˆ’$2,883
IACT
βˆ’$31,281
You keep$28,398more with IVV

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full IVV vs IACT report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, IVV or IACT?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers IVV wins on 3 measures and IACT on 4. IVV is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.04% vs 0.45%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $28,398. IVV is the larger fund at $14.9bn vs $520m. IACT has the better 1-year return: +11.3% vs +10.1%.

Which is cheaper, IVV or IACT?

IVV charges 0.04% a year and IACT charges 0.45% a year.

Can I hold both IVV and IACT?

You can, but check how much they overlap. IVV is a international shares fund and IACT is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

VGS vs IVVIVV vs BGBLIVV vs VTSIVV vs SPYIVV vs NDQIVV vs IHVVIVV vs VDHGIVV vs QUSIVV vs DGCEIVV vs TLRAIVV vs FANGIVV vs HACKIVV vs SEMIIVV vs LPGDIVV vs IJRIVV vs GLOB

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.