βš”οΈ Head to head

IVV vs GLOB: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

IVV comes out ahead on 5 of 8 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeIVV wins
IVV
0.04%
GLOB
0.99%

Worth about $62,766 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundIVV wins
IVV
$14.9bn
GLOB
$572m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnGLOB wins
IVV
+10.1%
GLOB
+10.5%
πŸ“Š3-year returnIVV wins
IVV
+19.2% a yr
GLOB
+12.9% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
IVV
+13.4% a yr
GLOB
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeIVV wins
IVV
0.02%
GLOB
0.22%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

IVV vs GLOB side by side

IVV leads on 5, GLOB on 3IVViShares S&P 500 ETFGLOBBarrow Hanley Global Share Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedS&P 500 IndexSee the PDS
Fund manageriSharesBarrow
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedOct 2007Jun 2022
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.04%βœ“0.99%
AUMfund size$14.9bnβœ“$572m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$84m$19mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%βœ“0.22%
Total returns
1 month+2.6%βœ“βˆ’1.1%
1 year+10.1%+10.5%βœ“
3 years p.a.+19.2%βœ“+12.9%
5 years p.a.+13.4%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,012$11,048βœ“
5 years ago$18,779–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

IVV vs GLOB price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only IVV has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $18,779 today.

IVVGLOB$10,000 invested
$0k$6k$12k$18k$24k$11.0k$11.0k1 year agoGLOB +$36$16.9k$14.4k3 years agoIVV +$2,567$18.8ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

IVV's lower fee leaves about $62,766 more in your pocket over 20 years.

IVV charges 0.04% a yearGLOB charges 0.99% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
IVV
βˆ’$262
GLOB
βˆ’$6,369
You keep$6,108more with IVV
10 years
IVV
βˆ’$734
GLOB
βˆ’$17,461
You keep$16,727more with IVV
20 years
IVV
βˆ’$2,883
GLOB
βˆ’$65,649
You keep$62,766more with IVV

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full IVV vs GLOB report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, IVV or GLOB?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers IVV wins on 5 measures and GLOB on 3. IVV is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.04% vs 0.99%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $62,766. IVV is the larger fund at $14.9bn vs $572m. GLOB has the better 1-year return: +10.5% vs +10.1%.

Which is cheaper, IVV or GLOB?

IVV charges 0.04% a year and GLOB charges 0.99% a year.

Can I hold both IVV and GLOB?

You can, but check how much they overlap. IVV is a international shares fund and GLOB is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

VGS vs IVVIVV vs BGBLIVV vs VTSIVV vs SPYIVV vs NDQIVV vs IHVVIVV vs VDHGIVV vs QUSIVV vs DGCEIVV vs TLRAIVV vs FANGIVV vs HACKIVV vs SEMIIVV vs LPGDIVV vs IJRIVV vs IACT

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.