βš”οΈ Head to head

IVV vs FGSE: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

IVV comes out ahead on 4 of 5 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeIVV wins
IVV
0.04%
FGSE
0.74%

Worth about $47,267 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundIVV wins
IVV
$14.9bn
FGSE
$372m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnToo close to call
IVV
+10.1%
FGSE
–
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
IVV
+19.2% a yr
FGSE
–
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
IVV
+13.4% a yr
FGSE
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeIVV wins
IVV
0.02%
FGSE
0.50%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

IVV vs FGSE side by side

IVV leads on 4, FGSE on 1IVViShares S&P 500 ETFFGSEFranklin Global Systematic Equity Fund – Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedS&P 500 IndexSee the PDS
Fund manageriSharesFranklin Templeton
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedOct 2007Jun 2026
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.04%βœ“0.74%
AUMfund size$14.9bnβœ“$372m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$84m$17mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.02%βœ“0.50%
Total returns
1 month+2.6%βœ“+1.6%
1 year+10.1%–
3 years p.a.+19.2%–
5 years p.a.+13.4%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,012–
5 years ago$18,779–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

IVV vs FGSE price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only IVV has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $18,779 today.

IVVFGSE$10,000 invested
$0k$6k$12k$18k$24k$11.0ktoo new1 year ago$16.9ktoo new3 years ago$18.8ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

IVV's lower fee leaves about $47,267 more in your pocket over 20 years.

IVV charges 0.04% a yearFGSE charges 0.74% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
IVV
βˆ’$262
FGSE
βˆ’$4,783
You keep$4,521more with IVV
10 years
IVV
βˆ’$734
FGSE
βˆ’$13,189
You keep$12,455more with IVV
20 years
IVV
βˆ’$2,883
FGSE
βˆ’$50,150
You keep$47,267more with IVV

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full IVV vs FGSE report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, IVV or FGSE?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers IVV wins on 4 measures and FGSE on 1. IVV is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.04% vs 0.74%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $47,267. IVV is the larger fund at $14.9bn vs $372m. IVV has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.02%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, IVV or FGSE?

IVV charges 0.04% a year and FGSE charges 0.74% a year.

Can I hold both IVV and FGSE?

You can, but check how much they overlap. IVV is a international shares fund and FGSE is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

VGS vs IVVIVV vs BGBLIVV vs VTSIVV vs SPYIVV vs NDQIVV vs IHVVIVV vs VDHGIVV vs QUSIVV vs DGCEIVV vs TLRAIVV vs FANGIVV vs HACKIVV vs SEMIIVV vs LPGDIVV vs IJRIVV vs GLOB

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.