βš”οΈ Head to head

IOZ vs AASF: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

IOZ comes out ahead on 10 of 10 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeIOZ wins
IOZ
0.05%
AASF
0.78%

Worth about $49,076 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundIOZ wins
IOZ
$9.7bn
AASF
$792m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnIOZ wins
IOZ
+2.6%
AASF
+1.6%
πŸ“Š3-year returnIOZ wins
IOZ
+10.8% a yr
AASF
+7.7% a yr
🏁5-year returnIOZ wins
IOZ
+6.8% a yr
AASF
+5.5% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeIOZ wins
IOZ
0.04%
AASF
0.45%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

IOZ vs AASF side by side

IOZ leads on 10, AASF on 0IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETFAASFAirlie Australian Share Fund - Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedS&P/ASX 200 IndexSee the PDS
Fund manageriSharesAirlie
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedDec 2010Jun 2020
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.05%βœ“0.78%
AUMfund size$9.7bnβœ“$792m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$321mβœ“βˆ’$12m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.04%βœ“0.45%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’2.4%βœ“βˆ’3.6%
1 year+2.6%βœ“+1.6%
3 years p.a.+10.8%βœ“+7.7%
5 years p.a.+6.8%βœ“+5.5%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,262βœ“$10,163
5 years ago$13,895βœ“$13,063

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

IOZ vs AASF price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into IOZ 5 years ago is worth $13,895 today, against $13,063 in AASF. That is $832 more in IOZ.

IOZAASF$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$10.3k$10.2k1 year agoIOZ +$99$13.6k$12.5k3 years agoIOZ +$1,100$13.9k$13.1k5 years agoIOZ +$832

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

IOZ's lower fee leaves about $49,076 more in your pocket over 20 years.

IOZ charges 0.05% a yearAASF charges 0.78% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
IOZ
βˆ’$327
AASF
βˆ’$5,038
You keep$4,711more with IOZ
10 years
IOZ
βˆ’$917
AASF
βˆ’$13,879
You keep$12,961more with IOZ
20 years
IOZ
βˆ’$3,601
AASF
βˆ’$52,676
You keep$49,076more with IOZ

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full IOZ vs AASF report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, IOZ or AASF?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers IOZ wins on 10 measures and AASF on 0. IOZ is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.05% vs 0.78%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $49,076. IOZ is the larger fund at $9.7bn vs $792m. IOZ has the better 1-year return: +2.6% vs +1.6%.

Which is cheaper, IOZ or AASF?

IOZ charges 0.05% a year and AASF charges 0.78% a year.

Can I hold both IOZ and AASF?

You can, but check how much they overlap. IOZ is a Australian shares fund and AASF is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VAS vs IOZA200 vs IOZIOZ vs STWIOZ vs E200IOZ vs OZRIOZ vs DACEIOZ vs DAVAIOZ vs QOZIOZ vs MQAEIOZ vs FAIRIOZ vs ILCIOZ vs SFYIOZ vs VETHIOZ vs IESGIOZ vs ATECIOZ vs MVE

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.