ILC vs YMAX: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
ILC comes out ahead on 8 of 10 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $34,421 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.
ILC vs YMAX side by side
| ILC leads on 8, YMAX on 2 | ILCiShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF | YMAXBetashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | S&P/ASX 20 Index | Not an index fund: top 20 Australian shares with a covered call strategy |
| Fund manager | iShares | Betashares |
| Asset class | Australian shares | Australian shares |
| Listed | Dec 2010 | Nov 2012 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.24%✓ | 0.76% |
| AUMfund size | $793m✓ | $696m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $0.0m | $19m✓ |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.05%✓ | 0.18% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −1.5% | −1.4%✓ |
| 1 year | +6.2%✓ | +1.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | +11.9%✓ | +7.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | +7.9%✓ | +5.6% |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,618✓ | $10,183 |
| 5 years ago | $14,622✓ | $13,110 |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
ILC vs YMAX price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into ILC 5 years ago is worth $14,622 today, against $13,110 in YMAX. That is $1,512 more in ILC.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
ILC's lower fee leaves about $34,421 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
ILC and YMAX overlap
19 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of ILC | % of YMAX |
|---|---|---|
| 16.84% | 17.09% | |
| 16.06% | 16.24% | |
| 7.45% | 7.56% | |
| 7.25% | 7.35% | |
| 7.09% | 7.19% | |
| 5.53% | 5.61% | |
| 5.01% | 5.08% | |
| 4.96% | 5.30% | |
| 3.65% | 3.69% | |
| 3.17% | 3.22% | |
| 3.18% | 3.12% | |
| 3.15% | 3.04% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full ILC vs YMAX report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, ILC or YMAX?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers ILC wins on 8 measures and YMAX on 2. ILC is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.24% vs 0.76%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $34,421. ILC is the larger fund at $793m vs $696m. ILC has the better 1-year return: +6.2% vs +1.8%.
Which is cheaper, ILC or YMAX?
ILC charges 0.24% a year and YMAX charges 0.76% a year.
Can I hold both ILC and YMAX?
You can, but check how much they overlap. ILC is a Australian shares fund and YMAX is a Australian shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.