IFRA vs VBLD: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
IFRA comes out ahead on 6 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $18,401 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
IFRA vs VBLD side by side
| IFRA leads on 6, VBLD on 3 | IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | VBLDVanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index, hedged to AUD | FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure Index |
| Fund manager | VanEck | Vanguard |
| Asset class | Property & infrastructure | Property & infrastructure |
| Listed | May 2016 | Oct 2018 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.20%✓ | 0.47% |
| AUMfund size | $2.1bn✓ | $648m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $56m✓ | $18m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −5.3% | −3.1%✓ |
| 1 year | +5.3%✓ | −0.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | +12.1%✓ | +9.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | +5.3% | +6.0%✓ |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,530✓ | $9,919 |
| 5 years ago | $12,942 | $13,353✓ |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
IFRA vs VBLD price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into IFRA 5 years ago is worth $12,942 today, against $13,353 in VBLD. That is $411 more in VBLD.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
IFRA's lower fee leaves about $18,401 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
IFRA and VBLD overlap
139 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of IFRA | % of VBLD |
|---|---|---|
| 4.78% | 5.55% | |
| 3.96% | 5.66% | |
| 3.28% | 3.35% | |
| 3.02% | 3.12% | |
| 2.77% | 3.64% | |
| 2.57% | 2.68% | |
| 2.28% | 2.91% | |
| 2.20% | 2.67% | |
| 2.15% | 2.27% | |
| 2.12% | 3.03% | |
| 1.78% | 1.87% | |
| 1.75% | 2.66% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full IFRA vs VBLD report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, IFRA or VBLD?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers IFRA wins on 6 measures and VBLD on 3. IFRA is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.20% vs 0.47%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $18,401. IFRA is the larger fund at $2.1bn vs $648m. IFRA has the better 1-year return: +5.3% vs −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, IFRA or VBLD?
IFRA charges 0.20% a year and VBLD charges 0.47% a year.
Can I hold both IFRA and VBLD?
You can, but check how much they overlap. IFRA is a property & infrastructure fund and VBLD is a property & infrastructure fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.