βš”οΈ Head to head

HYGG vs VDAL: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

VDAL comes out ahead on 5 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeVDAL wins
HYGG
0.70%
VDAL
0.27%

Worth about $28,537 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundHYGG wins
HYGG
$3.4bn
VDAL
$515m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnVDAL wins
HYGG
βˆ’5.9%
VDAL
+8.8%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
HYGG
+20.9% a yr
VDAL
–
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
HYGG
+8.9% a yr
VDAL
–
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeVDAL wins
HYGG
0.23%
VDAL
0.06%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

HYGG vs VDAL side by side

HYGG leads on 2, VDAL on 5HYGGHyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETFVDALVanguard Diversified All Growth Index ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSNo single index: a mix of Vanguard index funds
Fund managerHyperionVanguard
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedMar 2021Mar 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.70%0.27%βœ“
AUMfund size$3.4bnβœ“$515m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$36m$33mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.23%0.06%βœ“
Total returns
1 month+5.1%βœ“βˆ’0.3%
1 yearβˆ’5.9%+8.8%βœ“
3 years p.a.+20.9%–
5 years p.a.+8.9%–
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$9,409$10,881βœ“
5 years ago$15,300–

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

HYGG vs VDAL price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only HYGG has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $15,300 today.

HYGGVDAL$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$9.4k$10.9k1 year agoVDAL +$1,472$17.7ktoo new3 years ago$15.3ktoo new5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

VDAL's lower fee leaves about $28,537 more in your pocket over 20 years.

HYGG charges 0.70% a yearVDAL charges 0.27% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
HYGG
βˆ’$4,528
VDAL
βˆ’$1,761
You keep$2,767more with VDAL
10 years
HYGG
βˆ’$12,497
VDAL
βˆ’$4,908
You keep$7,589more with VDAL
20 years
HYGG
βˆ’$47,605
VDAL
βˆ’$19,068
You keep$28,537more with VDAL

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full HYGG vs VDAL report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, HYGG or VDAL?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers HYGG wins on 2 measures and VDAL on 5. VDAL is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.27% vs 0.70%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $28,537. HYGG is the larger fund at $3.4bn vs $515m. VDAL has the better 1-year return: +8.8% vs βˆ’5.9%.

Which is cheaper, HYGG or VDAL?

HYGG charges 0.70% a year and VDAL charges 0.27% a year.

Can I hold both HYGG and VDAL?

You can, but check how much they overlap. HYGG is a international shares fund and VDAL is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

HYGG vs QSMLHYGG vs VISMHYGG vs WCMQHYGG vs MAETDHHF vs VDALVDHG vs VDALVEU vs VDALIWLD vs VDALVDAL vs MAET

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.