βš”οΈ Head to head

HYGG vs MAET: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

HYGG comes out ahead on 7 of 10 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeHYGG wins
HYGG
0.70%
MAET
1.35%

Worth about $39,178 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundHYGG wins
HYGG
$3.4bn
MAET
$374m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnMAET wins
HYGG
βˆ’5.9%
MAET
+2.2%
πŸ“Š3-year returnHYGG wins
HYGG
+20.9% a yr
MAET
+19.5% a yr
🏁5-year returnHYGG wins
HYGG
+8.9% a yr
MAET
+8.1% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeHYGG wins
HYGG
0.23%
MAET
0.29%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

HYGG vs MAET side by side

HYGG leads on 7, MAET on 3HYGGHyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETFMAETMunro Global Growth Fund Complex ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerHyperionMunro
Asset classInternational sharesInternational shares
ListedMar 2021Nov 2020
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.70%βœ“1.35%
AUMfund size$3.4bnβœ“$374m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last monthβˆ’$36m$9.2mβœ“
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.23%βœ“0.29%
Total returns
1 month+5.1%βœ“+0.2%
1 yearβˆ’5.9%+2.2%βœ“
3 years p.a.+20.9%βœ“+19.5%
5 years p.a.+8.9%βœ“+8.1%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$9,409$10,218βœ“
5 years ago$15,300βœ“$14,741

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

HYGG vs MAET price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into HYGG 5 years ago is worth $15,300 today, against $14,741 in MAET. That is $559 more in HYGG.

HYGGMAET$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$9.4k$10.2k1 year agoMAET +$809$17.7k$17.1k3 years agoHYGG +$633$15.3k$14.7k5 years agoHYGG +$559

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

HYGG's lower fee leaves about $39,178 more in your pocket over 20 years.

HYGG charges 0.70% a yearMAET charges 1.35% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
HYGG
βˆ’$4,528
MAET
βˆ’$8,627
You keep$4,099more with HYGG
10 years
HYGG
βˆ’$12,497
MAET
βˆ’$23,456
You keep$10,960more with HYGG
20 years
HYGG
βˆ’$47,605
MAET
βˆ’$86,783
You keep$39,178more with HYGG

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full HYGG vs MAET report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, HYGG or MAET?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers HYGG wins on 7 measures and MAET on 3. HYGG is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.70% vs 1.35%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $39,178. HYGG is the larger fund at $3.4bn vs $374m. MAET has the better 1-year return: +2.2% vs βˆ’5.9%.

Which is cheaper, HYGG or MAET?

HYGG charges 0.70% a year and MAET charges 1.35% a year.

Can I hold both HYGG and MAET?

You can, but check how much they overlap. HYGG is a international shares fund and MAET is a international shares fund.

More comparisons

HYGG vs QSMLHYGG vs VISMHYGG vs VDALHYGG vs WCMQMAET vs MCGGVDAL vs MAET

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.