GLIN vs MICH: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
GLIN comes out ahead on 5 of 6 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $59,160 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.
GLIN vs MICH side by side
| GLIN leads on 5, MICH on 1 | GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | MICHMagellan Infra Fund (Currency Hedged) - Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | See the PDS | See the PDS |
| Fund manager | iShares | Magellan |
| Asset class | Property & infrastructure | Property & infrastructure |
| Listed | May 2023 | Jul 2016 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.15%✓ | 1.06% |
| AUMfund size | $1.9bn✓ | $426m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $182m✓ | −$1.3m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.06%✓ | 0.39% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −5.5% | −4.9%✓ |
| 1 year | +5.7% | +5.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | +12.3%✓ | +11.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | – | +5.2% |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,570 | $10,566 |
| 5 years ago | – | $12,907 |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
GLIN vs MICH price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
Only MICH has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $12,907 today.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
GLIN's lower fee leaves about $59,160 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
Get the full GLIN vs MICH report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, GLIN or MICH?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers GLIN wins on 5 measures and MICH on 1. GLIN is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.15% vs 1.06%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $59,160. GLIN is the larger fund at $1.9bn vs $426m. GLIN has the better 3-year return: +12.3% a year vs +11.8%.
Which is cheaper, GLIN or MICH?
GLIN charges 0.15% a year and MICH charges 1.06% a year.
Can I hold both GLIN and MICH?
You can, but check how much they overlap. GLIN is a property & infrastructure fund and MICH is a property & infrastructure fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.