GLIN vs GLPR: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
It is a dead heat: 3 measures each. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
GLIN vs GLPR side by side
| GLIN leads on 3, GLPR on 3 | GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | GLPRiShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | See the PDS | FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed ex-Australia Rental Net Tax Index, hedged to AUD |
| Fund manager | iShares | iShares |
| Asset class | Property & infrastructure | Property & infrastructure |
| Listed | May 2023 | May 2023 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| AUMfund size | $1.9bn✓ | $695m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $182m✓ | $22m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.06% | 0.10% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −5.5% | −4.9%✓ |
| 1 year | +5.7% | +6.3%✓ |
| 3 years p.a. | +12.3%✓ | +8.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | – | – |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,570 | $10,633✓ |
| 5 years ago | – | – |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
GLIN vs GLPR price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into GLIN 3 years ago is worth $14,152 today, against $12,860 in GLPR. That is $1,292 more in GLIN.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
GLIN and GLPR charge the same fee, so fees make no difference between them.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
GLIN and GLPR overlap
5 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of GLIN | % of GLPR |
|---|---|---|
| 0.29% | 0.16% | |
| 0.06% | 0.08% | |
| 0.02% | 0.02% | |
| 0.01% | 0.01% | |
| 0.01% | 0.02% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs →
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full GLIN vs GLPR report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, GLIN or GLPR?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers GLIN wins on 3 measures and GLPR on 3. GLIN is the larger fund at $1.9bn vs $695m. GLPR has the better 1-year return: +6.3% vs +5.7%. GLIN has the better 3-year return: +12.3% a year vs +8.7%.
Which is cheaper, GLIN or GLPR?
GLIN charges 0.15% a year and GLPR charges 0.15% a year.
Can I hold both GLIN and GLPR?
You can, but check how much they overlap. GLIN is a property & infrastructure fund and GLPR is a property & infrastructure fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.