βš”οΈ Head to head

GIFL vs SLF: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

GIFL comes out ahead on 4 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeSLF wins
GIFL
0.98%
SLF
0.16%

Worth about $53,633 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundGIFL wins
GIFL
$3.0bn
SLF
$451m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnGIFL wins
GIFL
+6.1%
SLF
βˆ’14.1%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
GIFL
–
SLF
+9.3% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
GIFL
–
SLF
+2.4% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeSLF wins
GIFL
0.20%
SLF
0.13%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

GIFL vs SLF side by side

GIFL leads on 4, SLF on 3GIFLLazard Global Listed Infrastructure Active ETFSLFSPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSS&P/ASX 200 A-REIT Index
Fund managerLazardState Street (SPDR)
Asset classProperty & infrastructureProperty & infrastructure
ListedJun 2024Feb 2002
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.98%0.16%βœ“
AUMfund size$3.0bnβœ“$451m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$75mβœ“βˆ’$5.2m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.20%0.13%βœ“
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’4.7%βˆ’1.7%βœ“
1 year+6.1%βœ“βˆ’14.1%
3 years p.a.–+9.3%
5 years p.a.–+2.4%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,612βœ“$8,590
5 years ago–$11,233

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only SLF has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $11,233 today.

GIFLSLF$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$10.6k$8.6k1 year agoGIFL +$2,022too new$13.1k3 years agotoo new$11.2k5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

SLF's lower fee leaves about $53,633 more in your pocket over 20 years.

GIFL charges 0.98% a yearSLF charges 0.16% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
GIFL
βˆ’$6,306
SLF
βˆ’$1,046
You keep$5,261more with SLF
10 years
GIFL
βˆ’$17,292
SLF
βˆ’$2,922
You keep$14,370more with SLF
20 years
GIFL
βˆ’$65,042
SLF
βˆ’$11,410
You keep$53,633more with SLF

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full GIFL vs SLF report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, GIFL or SLF?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers GIFL wins on 4 measures and SLF on 3. SLF is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.16% vs 0.98%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $53,633. GIFL is the larger fund at $3.0bn vs $451m. GIFL has the better 1-year return: +6.1% vs βˆ’14.1%.

Which is cheaper, GIFL or SLF?

GIFL charges 0.98% a year and SLF charges 0.16% a year.

Can I hold both GIFL and SLF?

You can, but check how much they overlap. GIFL is a property & infrastructure fund and SLF is a property & infrastructure fund.

More comparisons

GIFL vs IFRAGIFL vs GLINGIFL vs CUIVGIFL vs VBLDGIFL vs DJREGIFL vs QGRUGIFL vs MCSIVAP vs SLFMVA vs SLF

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.