βš”οΈ Head to head

GIFL vs CUIV: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

GIFL comes out ahead on 5 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeCUIV wins
GIFL
0.98%
CUIV
0.97%

Worth about $608 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundGIFL wins
GIFL
$3.0bn
CUIV
$678m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnGIFL wins
GIFL
+6.1%
CUIV
βˆ’0.4%
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeGIFL wins
GIFL
0.20%
CUIV
0.40%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

GIFL vs CUIV side by side

GIFL leads on 5, CUIV on 2GIFLLazard Global Listed Infrastructure Active ETFCUIVCB GLBL Infrastructure Value Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerLazardClearBridge
Asset classProperty & infrastructureProperty & infrastructure
ListedJun 2024Apr 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.98%0.97%βœ“
AUMfund size$3.0bnβœ“$678m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$75mβœ“$1.8m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.20%βœ“0.40%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’4.7%βˆ’3.5%βœ“
1 year+6.1%βœ“βˆ’0.4%
3 years p.a.––
5 years p.a.––
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,612βœ“$9,958
5 years ago––

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into GIFL 1 year ago is worth $10,612 today, against $9,958 in CUIV. That is $654 more in GIFL.

GIFLCUIV$10,000 invested
$0k$3k$6k$9k$12k$10.6k$10.0k1 year agoGIFL +$654

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

CUIV's lower fee leaves about $608 more in your pocket over 20 years.

GIFL charges 0.98% a yearCUIV charges 0.97% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
GIFL
βˆ’$6,306
CUIV
βˆ’$6,243
You keep$63more with CUIV
10 years
GIFL
βˆ’$17,292
CUIV
βˆ’$17,123
You keep$169more with CUIV
20 years
GIFL
βˆ’$65,042
CUIV
βˆ’$64,435
You keep$608more with CUIV

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full GIFL vs CUIV report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, GIFL or CUIV?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers GIFL wins on 5 measures and CUIV on 2. CUIV is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.97% vs 0.98%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $608. GIFL is the larger fund at $3.0bn vs $678m. GIFL has the better 1-year return: +6.1% vs βˆ’0.4%.

Which is cheaper, GIFL or CUIV?

GIFL charges 0.98% a year and CUIV charges 0.97% a year.

Can I hold both GIFL and CUIV?

You can, but check how much they overlap. GIFL is a property & infrastructure fund and CUIV is a property & infrastructure fund.

More comparisons

GIFL vs IFRAGIFL vs GLINGIFL vs VBLDGIFL vs DJREGIFL vs QGRUGIFL vs SLFGIFL vs MCSICIVH vs CUIVCIIH vs CUIV

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.