βš”οΈ Head to head

GEAR vs BBOZ: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

GEAR comes out ahead on 6 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeGEAR wins
GEAR
0.80%
BBOZ
1.38%

Worth about $34,550 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundGEAR wins
GEAR
$572m
BBOZ
$165m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnBBOZ wins
GEAR
βˆ’1.2%
BBOZ
+0.7%
πŸ“Š3-year returnGEAR wins
GEAR
+17.1% a yr
BBOZ
βˆ’15.9% a yr
🏁5-year returnGEAR wins
GEAR
+8.4% a yr
BBOZ
βˆ’12.4% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeToo close to call
GEAR
0.07%
BBOZ
0.08%

GEAR vs BBOZ side by side

GEAR leads on 6, BBOZ on 3GEARBetashares Geared Australian Equities ETFBBOZBetashares Australian Equities Strong Bear ETF
The basics
Index trackedNot an index fund: geared exposure to large Australian sharesS&P/ASX 200 Index
Fund managerBetasharesBetashares
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedMay 2014Apr 2015
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.80%βœ“1.38%
AUMfund size$572mβœ“$165m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$22mβœ“βˆ’$22m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.07%0.08%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’5.5%+7.0%βœ“
1 yearβˆ’1.2%+0.7%βœ“
3 years p.a.+17.1%βœ“βˆ’15.9%
5 years p.a.+8.4%βœ“βˆ’12.4%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$9,880$10,065βœ“
5 years ago$14,966βœ“$5,172

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

GEAR vs BBOZ price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into GEAR 5 years ago is worth $14,966 today, against $5,172 in BBOZ. That is $9,794 more in GEAR.

GEARBBOZ$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$9.9k$10.1k1 year agoBBOZ +$185$16.1k$5.9k3 years agoGEAR +$10,134$15.0k$5.2k5 years agoGEAR +$9,794

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

GEAR's lower fee leaves about $34,550 more in your pocket over 20 years.

GEAR charges 0.80% a yearBBOZ charges 1.38% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
GEAR
βˆ’$5,165
BBOZ
βˆ’$8,814
You keep$3,649more with GEAR
10 years
GEAR
βˆ’$14,223
BBOZ
βˆ’$23,948
You keep$9,725more with GEAR
20 years
GEAR
βˆ’$53,933
BBOZ
βˆ’$88,483
You keep$34,550more with GEAR

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full GEAR vs BBOZ report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, GEAR or BBOZ?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers GEAR wins on 6 measures and BBOZ on 3. GEAR is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.80% vs 1.38%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $34,550. GEAR is the larger fund at $572m vs $165m. BBOZ has the better 1-year return: +0.7% vs βˆ’1.2%.

Which is cheaper, GEAR or BBOZ?

GEAR charges 0.80% a year and BBOZ charges 1.38% a year.

Can I hold both GEAR and BBOZ?

You can, but check how much they overlap. GEAR is a Australian shares fund and BBOZ is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

AMVE vs GEARYMAX vs GEARAMVE vs BBOZ

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.