βš”οΈ Head to head

FSML vs SMLL: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

SMLL comes out ahead on 5 of 7 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeSMLL wins
FSML
0.85%
SMLL
0.39%

Worth about $29,802 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundFSML wins
FSML
$638m
SMLL
$369m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnSMLL wins
FSML
βˆ’1.4%
SMLL
+4.3%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
FSML
–
SMLL
+13.6% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
FSML
–
SMLL
+4.7% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeSMLL wins
FSML
0.52%
SMLL
0.38%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

FSML vs SMLL side by side

FSML leads on 2, SMLL on 5FSMLFiretrail Australian Small Companies Fund – Active ETFSMLLBetashares Australian Small Companies Select ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerFiretrailBetashares
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedNov 2024Apr 2017
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.85%0.39%βœ“
AUMfund size$638mβœ“$369m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$20mβœ“βˆ’$13m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.52%0.38%βœ“
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’1.0%βˆ’0.4%βœ“
1 yearβˆ’1.4%+4.3%βœ“
3 years p.a.–+13.6%
5 years p.a.–+4.7%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$9,864$10,433βœ“
5 years ago–$12,610

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

FSML vs SMLL price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only SMLL has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $12,610 today.

FSMLSMLL$10,000 invested
$0k$5k$10k$15k$20k$9.9k$10.4k1 year agoSMLL +$569too new$14.6k3 years agotoo new$12.6k5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

SMLL's lower fee leaves about $29,802 more in your pocket over 20 years.

FSML charges 0.85% a yearSMLL charges 0.39% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
FSML
βˆ’$5,483
SMLL
βˆ’$2,537
You keep$2,946more with SMLL
10 years
FSML
βˆ’$15,080
SMLL
βˆ’$7,054
You keep$8,026more with SMLL
20 years
FSML
βˆ’$57,055
SMLL
βˆ’$27,253
You keep$29,802more with SMLL

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full FSML vs SMLL report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, FSML or SMLL?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers FSML wins on 2 measures and SMLL on 5. SMLL is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.39% vs 0.85%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $29,802. FSML is the larger fund at $638m vs $369m. SMLL has the better 1-year return: +4.3% vs βˆ’1.4%.

Which is cheaper, FSML or SMLL?

FSML charges 0.85% a year and SMLL charges 0.39% a year.

Can I hold both FSML and SMLL?

You can, but check how much they overlap. FSML is a Australian shares fund and SMLL is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

VSO vs FSMLFSML vs MVSFSML vs VLCVSO vs SMLLSMLL vs MVS

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.