E200 vs IHD: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
IHD comes out ahead on 6 of 9 measures. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $12,700 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
E200 vs IHD side by side
| E200 leads on 3, IHD on 6 | E200State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF | IHDiShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | S&P/ASX 200 ESG Index | See the PDS |
| Fund manager | State Street (SPDR) | iShares |
| Asset class | Australian shares | Australian shares |
| Listed | Aug 2020 | Dec 2010 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.05%β | 0.23% |
| AUMfund size | $474mβ | $407m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $74mβ | $5.1m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.11% | 0.11% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | β2.1% | β1.0%β |
| 1 year | +3.0% | +8.8%β |
| 3 years p.a. | +10.5% | +13.5%β |
| 5 years p.a. | +7.0% | +8.8%β |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $10,299 | $10,885β |
| 5 years ago | $14,006 | $15,251β |
β marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
E200 vs IHD price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
$10,000 put into E200 5 years ago is worth $14,006 today, against $15,251 in IHD. That is $1,245 more in IHD.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
E200's lower fee leaves about $12,700 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
E200 and IHD overlap
21 companies appear in both funds. Overlap is the share of the portfolio that is the same in both, counting the smaller weight of each shared company.
| Biggest shared holdings | % of E200 | % of IHD |
|---|---|---|
| 7.21% | 10.03% | |
| 7.03% | 9.55% | |
| 3.08% | 5.95% | |
| 3.04% | 9.09% | |
| 2.41% | 8.16% | |
| 2.17% | 4.89% | |
| 1.32% | 4.55% | |
| 1.18% | 3.03% | |
| 0.78% | 1.82% | |
| 0.54% | 2.14% | |
| 0.27% | 1.12% | |
| 0.27% | 0.74% |
Add more ETFs and see the overlap in Compare ETFs β
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full E200 vs IHD report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- β FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter

FAQs
Which is better, E200 or IHD?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers E200 wins on 3 measures and IHD on 6. E200 is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.05% vs 0.23%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $12,700. E200 is the larger fund at $474m vs $407m. IHD has the better 1-year return: +8.8% vs +3.0%.
Which is cheaper, E200 or IHD?
E200 charges 0.05% a year and IHD charges 0.23% a year.
Can I hold both E200 and IHD?
You can, but check how much they overlap. E200 is a Australian shares fund and IHD is a Australian shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.