DFGH vs HJPN: Which ETF Is Better?
A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.
It is a dead heat: 3 measures each. Which matters most depends on you.
The short answer
Worth about $13,330 on $100,000 over 20 years.
Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.
DFGH vs HJPN side by side
| DFGH leads on 3, HJPN on 3 | DFGHDimensional Global Core Equity Trust (AUD Hedged Class) – Active ETF | HJPNBetashares Japan Currency Hedged ETF |
|---|---|---|
| The basics | ||
| Index tracked | See the PDS | See the PDS |
| Fund manager | Dimensional | Betashares |
| Asset class | International shares | International shares |
| Listed | Nov 2023 | May 2016 |
| Cost and size | ||
| MERyearly fee, lower is better | 0.36%✓ | 0.56% |
| AUMfund size | $4.2bn✓ | $355m |
| Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month | $41m✓ | $11m |
| Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better | 0.13% | 0.12% |
| Total returns | ||
| 1 month | −1.3% | −0.5%✓ |
| 1 year | +18.2% | +43.4%✓ |
| 3 years p.a. | – | +27.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | – | +17.3% |
| $10,000 invested | ||
| 1 year ago | $11,823 | $14,335✓ |
| 5 years ago | – | $22,247 |
✓ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.
DFGH vs HJPN price chart
Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions · TradingView
What $10,000 invested is worth now
Only HJPN has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $22,247 today.
Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
What the fees cost you
DFGH's lower fee leaves about $13,330 more in your pocket over 20 years.
Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.
Do DFGH and HJPN hold the same companies?
0 of their top 10 holdings are the same. They are reasonably different underneath.
Based on the top 10 holdings last published by each issuer.
Best-endeavours estimate. Built from each issuer's published holdings, which may be weeks or months old, may cover only part of a fund (some publish only their top 10) and are matched by company name. Figures may be incomplete or inaccurate. Check the issuer's website and PDS before relying on them. General information only.
Get the full DFGH vs HJPN report
- Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
- Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
- Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
- Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
- ★ FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
FAQs
Which is better, DFGH or HJPN?
It depends on what you need. On our numbers DFGH wins on 3 measures and HJPN on 3. DFGH is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.36% vs 0.56%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $13,330. DFGH is the larger fund at $4.2bn vs $355m. HJPN has the better 1-year return: +43.4% vs +18.2%.
Which is cheaper, DFGH or HJPN?
DFGH charges 0.36% a year and HJPN charges 0.56% a year.
Can I hold both DFGH and HJPN?
You can, but check how much they overlap. DFGH is a international shares fund and HJPN is a international shares fund.
More comparisons
General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.