βš”οΈ Head to head

DACE vs MQAE: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

DACE comes out ahead on 4 of 6 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeMQAE wins
DACE
0.28%
MQAE
0.03%

Worth about $17,593 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundDACE wins
DACE
$7.2bn
MQAE
$1.3bn

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnDACE wins
DACE
+4.9%
MQAE
+1.6%
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeToo close to call
DACE
0.14%
MQAE
0.11%

DACE vs MQAE side by side

DACE leads on 4, MQAE on 2DACEDimensional Australian Core Equity Trust – Active ETFMQAEMacquarie Core Australian Equity Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerDimensionalMacquarie
Asset classAustralian sharesAustralian shares
ListedNov 2023May 2024
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better0.28%0.03%βœ“
AUMfund size$7.2bnβœ“$1.3bn
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$91mβœ“$63m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.14%0.11%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’1.8%βˆ’1.7%βœ“
1 year+4.9%βœ“+1.6%
3 years p.a.––
5 years p.a.––
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$10,493βœ“$10,155
5 years ago––

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

DACE vs MQAE price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into DACE 1 year ago is worth $10,493 today, against $10,155 in MQAE. That is $338 more in DACE.

DACEMQAE$10,000 invested
$0k$3k$6k$9k$12k$10.5k$10.2k1 year agoDACE +$338

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

MQAE's lower fee leaves about $17,593 more in your pocket over 20 years.

DACE charges 0.28% a yearMQAE charges 0.03% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
DACE
βˆ’$1,826
MQAE
βˆ’$197
You keep$1,629more with MQAE
10 years
DACE
βˆ’$5,087
MQAE
βˆ’$551
You keep$4,537more with MQAE
20 years
DACE
βˆ’$19,757
MQAE
βˆ’$2,164
You keep$17,593more with MQAE

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full DACE vs MQAE report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, DACE or MQAE?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers DACE wins on 4 measures and MQAE on 2. MQAE is cheaper, with a management fee of 0.03% vs 0.28%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $17,593. DACE is the larger fund at $7.2bn vs $1.3bn. DACE has the better 1-year return: +4.9% vs +1.6%.

Which is cheaper, DACE or MQAE?

DACE charges 0.28% a year and MQAE charges 0.03% a year.

Can I hold both DACE and MQAE?

You can, but check how much they overlap. DACE is a Australian shares fund and MQAE is a Australian shares fund.

More comparisons

IOZ vs DACEDACE vs IESGIOZ vs MQAEMQAE vs IESG

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.