βš”οΈ Head to head

CIIH vs MICH: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

CIIH comes out ahead on 6 of 6 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeCIIH wins
CIIH
1.02%
MICH
1.06%

Worth about $2,403 on $100,000 over 20 years.

🏦Bigger fundCIIH wins
CIIH
$1.4bn
MICH
$426m

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnCIIH wins
CIIH
+10.5%
MICH
+5.7%
πŸ“Š3-year returnToo close to call
CIIH
–
MICH
+11.8% a yr
🏁5-year returnToo close to call
CIIH
–
MICH
+5.2% a yr
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeToo close to call
CIIH
0.42%
MICH
0.39%

CIIH vs MICH side by side

CIIH leads on 6, MICH on 0CIIHCB Global Infrastructure Income (Hedged) Active ETFMICHMagellan Infra Fund (Currency Hedged) - Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerClearBridgeMagellan
Asset classProperty & infrastructureProperty & infrastructure
ListedApr 2025Jul 2016
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better1.02%βœ“1.06%
AUMfund size$1.4bnβœ“$426m
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$41mβœ“βˆ’$1.3m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.42%0.39%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’4.4%βœ“βˆ’4.9%
1 year+10.5%βœ“+5.7%
3 years p.a.–+11.8%
5 years p.a.–+5.2%
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,053βœ“$10,566
5 years ago–$12,907

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

CIIH vs MICH price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

Only MICH has a 5 years record: $10,000 then is worth $12,907 today.

CIIHMICH$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$11.1k$10.6k1 year agoCIIH +$487too new$14.0k3 years agotoo new$12.9k5 years ago

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

CIIH's lower fee leaves about $2,403 more in your pocket over 20 years.

CIIH charges 1.02% a yearMICH charges 1.06% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
CIIH
βˆ’$6,559
MICH
βˆ’$6,811
You keep$252more with CIIH
10 years
CIIH
βˆ’$17,968
MICH
βˆ’$18,641
You keep$674more with CIIH
20 years
CIIH
βˆ’$67,463
MICH
βˆ’$69,866
You keep$2,403more with CIIH

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full CIIH vs MICH report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, CIIH or MICH?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers CIIH wins on 6 measures and MICH on 0. CIIH is cheaper, with a management fee of 1.02% vs 1.06%. On $100,000 over 20 years that difference is worth about $2,403. CIIH is the larger fund at $1.4bn vs $426m. CIIH has the better 1-year return: +10.5% vs +5.7%.

Which is cheaper, CIIH or MICH?

CIIH charges 1.02% a year and MICH charges 1.06% a year.

Can I hold both CIIH and MICH?

You can, but check how much they overlap. CIIH is a property & infrastructure fund and MICH is a property & infrastructure fund.

More comparisons

CIIH vs CIVHIFRA vs CIIHGLIN vs CIIHCIIH vs CUIVIFRA vs MICHGLIN vs MICH

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.