βš”οΈ Head to head

CIIH vs CIVH: Which ETF Is Better?

A side-by-side comparison of fees, size, returns and holdings, using data to 30 September 2026.

CIIH comes out ahead on 6 of 6 measures. Which matters most depends on you.

The short answer

πŸ’ΈLower feeToo close to call
CIIH
1.02%
CIVH
1.02%
🏦Bigger fundCIIH wins
CIIH
$1.4bn
CIVH
$1.0bn

Bigger funds usually trade more cheaply and are less likely to close.

πŸ“ˆ1-year returnCIIH wins
CIIH
+10.5%
CIVH
+9.6%
βš–οΈCheaper to tradeCIIH wins
CIIH
0.42%
CIVH
0.46%

A tighter gap between the buy and sell price.

CIIH vs CIVH side by side

CIIH leads on 6, CIVH on 0CIIHCB Global Infrastructure Income (Hedged) Active ETFCIVHCB GLBL Infrastructure Value (Hedged) Active ETF
The basics
Index trackedSee the PDSSee the PDS
Fund managerClearBridgeClearBridge
Asset classProperty & infrastructureProperty & infrastructure
ListedApr 2025Apr 2025
Cost and size
MERyearly fee, lower is better1.02%1.02%
AUMfund size$1.4bnβœ“$1.0bn
Net flows (Sep)new money in, last month$41mβœ“$6.5m
Bid/ask spreadtrading cost, lower is better0.42%βœ“0.46%
Total returns
1 monthβˆ’4.4%βœ“βˆ’4.5%
1 year+10.5%βœ“+9.6%
3 years p.a.––
5 years p.a.––
$10,000 invested
1 year ago$11,053βœ“$10,963
5 years ago––

βœ“ marks the better figure on each measure. Returns include distributions, to 30 September 2026.

CIIH vs CIVH price chart

Both ETFs on one chart as % change. Use the 1D to All buttons to change the period. Price only, so it leaves out distributions Β· TradingView

πŸ“ˆ Growth

What $10,000 invested is worth now

$10,000 put into CIIH 1 year ago is worth $11,053 today, against $10,963 in CIVH. That is $90 more in CIIH.

CIIHCIVH$10,000 invested
$0k$4k$8k$12k$16k$11.1k$11.0k1 year agoCIIH +$90

Total returns to 30 September 2026, with distributions reinvested, before tax and brokerage. The price chart above leaves out distributions, so it can look worse. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

πŸ’Έ Cost

What the fees cost you

CIIH and CIVH charge the same fee, so fees make no difference between them.

CIIH charges 1.02% a yearCIVH charges 1.02% a year
🧾 Fees paid on $100,000Saving
5 years
CIIH
βˆ’$6,559
CIVH
βˆ’$6,559
Same cost
10 years
CIIH
βˆ’$17,968
CIVH
βˆ’$17,968
Same cost
20 years
CIIH
βˆ’$67,463
CIVH
βˆ’$67,463
Same cost

Total fees paid on a $100,000 investment, assuming a 7% a year return before fees. Illustration only: it ignores tax, brokerage and differences in returns.

Free PDF report

Get the full CIIH vs CIVH report

  • Every holding of each ETF: the top 50 companies, with sectors and countries
  • Exactly which companies they share, and how much of each
  • Fees in dollars over 10, 20 and 30 years
  • Every metric side by side, including the index each tracks
  • β˜… FREE BONUSIs now a good time to invest? The Market Health-O-Meter
⬇ Get the free report
Joshua Stega
etfadviserExchange traded fund specialist adviser Β· 20 years’ experience
Keep in touch with the marketsWeekly ETF research, the Market Health-O-Meter and our model portfolio.Try it free for 30 days β†’

FAQs

Which is better, CIIH or CIVH?

It depends on what you need. On our numbers CIIH wins on 6 measures and CIVH on 0. CIIH is the larger fund at $1.4bn vs $1.0bn. CIIH has the better 1-year return: +10.5% vs +9.6%. CIIH has the tighter bid/ask spread (0.42%), so it is usually slightly cheaper to trade.

Which is cheaper, CIIH or CIVH?

CIIH charges 1.02% a year and CIVH charges 1.02% a year.

Can I hold both CIIH and CIVH?

You can, but check how much they overlap. CIIH is a property & infrastructure fund and CIVH is a property & infrastructure fund.

More comparisons

IFRA vs CIIHGLIN vs CIIHCIIH vs CUIVCIIH vs MICHCIVH vs CUIVIFRA vs CIVH

Add more ETFs to this comparison β†’

General information only, not a recommendation. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.